Just a short post today, basically to bring to your attention a video on YouTube that I’ve been alerted to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HjpX__vUTA

The big film this week is 300, director Zack Snyder’s gory and rabid retelling of the battle of Thermopylae, where 300 brave Spartan soldiers faced down the massed ranks of the mighty Persian Empire in 480BC. 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, who also created Sin City. Here, Snyder opts for a similar stylistic treatment, replicating Miller’s original comic book almost shot for shot. UNCUT contributor Jonathan Romney nailed it when he described 300 as “the kind of film Leni Riefenshtahl would have made if she had access to CGI.” It’s buffed, pumped-up chaps armed to the teeth with swords, spears and arrows killing each other in the most brutal and sadistic manner possible. Despite the bodycount and liberal blood-letting, you can’t quite take it entirely seriously – there’s a certain campery behind the carnage, Snyder’s increasingly beserk direction lending the whole thing a decidedly preposterous air. Needless to say, it’s great fun, if rather silly – there’s something pre-pubscent about the gleeful manner Snyder (and Miller) approach the Spartans’ suicide mission. As a comic book writer, Miller’s responsible for one of the genre’s stone-cold greats. The Dark Knight Returns, which reimagined Batman as a testosterone-fuelled psycho driving round an apocalyptic Gotham City in what basically passed for a tank. It's equalled only by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' Watchmen, a vast, conspiracy-laden whodunit featuring a cast of fucked-up superheroes - which is Snyder’s next project. An onerous task, as it’s lain in development hell for over a decade now. Gerard Butler, who plays Spartan king Leonidas in 300, is rumoured to be playing as Snake Plissken in a prequel to John Carpenter’s Escape From New York. I’ll let you know more about that soon as. I caught an early preview of Zodiac this week, the new film from Fight Club and Seven director David Fincher. It’s based on the Zodiac killings in San Francisco that began in the late Sixties. It’s a serial killer film like Seven, sure, but Fincher claims to have some personal investment here – he was raised in nearby Marin County when the killings began. What’s good: Jake Gyllenhaal and Robert Downey Jnr as the two newspaper men, and Mark Ruffalo as the cop assigned to the case, who gradually develop extreme obsessions with the case. Great performances, especially Downey, who looks uncannily like Pacino in Serpico. In fact, the attention to period detail – and the keynote movies of that time – are fantastic. What’s not: the historical circumstances behind the police investigation, sadly, don’t lend themselves to a punchy, third act confrontation and easy narrative resolution. Anway, next week I’ll let you know how 28 Weeks Later shapes up – the sequel to Danny Boyle’s zombie film 28 Days Later. And there’s also the small matter of Boyle’s latest – Sunshine…

Hey, one last report from last week's South By Southwest festival. This one is by Ben Perreau, who edits Uncut and NME's websites. Ben seems to have spent most of the week failing to get into parties and fantasising about Smashing Pumpkins, but he did manage to see the mighty Gallows, The Gossip and plenty more cool stuff. . . "South By Southwest boasts afternoon free-beer parties often with bigger names than the official evening events. Wednesday afternoon began with the fear that the previous nights' weather madness (grounded twice, our flight time had been doubled resulting in a final landing amongst fork-lightning) might return. We clung together, dismayed by the fact that the weather was better in London, and in our huddle rumours spread of the return of Smashing Pumpkins at a secret show later in the week. I was desperate to believe them. Unrattled, we stood in the wet gravel for NME's party at the legendary Stubbs for Brits in the mist Mumm-Ra, who inject enthusiasm into the afternoon. "This is our first gig in the USA," they announced, ahead of them lies relentless gigging and a string of dank motel rooms. The Young Knives galvanised, but they've just finished their first tour here - and it showed. Later, the evening was activated with Jamie T, the antidote. Perky and spry, he goaded the crowd into interacting with him. Ready to lavish us with more expletives, Lily Allen was evidently the big pull of the day, later having a pop at Uncut's sister publication NME three times during her short set. Soon to be famous for his burgeoning friendship with a Hollywood actress, Johnny Borrell (see April Long's earlier blog) rode the Razorlight beast onstage at around ten, and just as the sky cleared, so did the venue. Shame: Razorlight have been playing their eponymous second album for six months and their stage show is bound together far better than rumours of fractiousness suggest. New York boys of 2004 The Bravery close Wednesday night, but despite the headline slot, even their newly grown-up look couldn'tsave them. Thursday was bright and hot but that's where my luck ended. Amy Winehouse played a small nearby bar. I couldn't get in, so I gazed through the window for the five most glorious minutes of the afternoon and re-examined my itinerary. Determined not to see another Brit for the rest of the week (it's tough) I ambled over to the Mohawk Patio to be greeted by another ridiculous queue for The Besnard Lakes. Luckily all the way over at the other end of town, Cold War Kids left inches of standing room at La Zona Rosa, one of the biggest venues in town. One of the fun bands of last year, they proved somewhat dull and we snuck off to watch the usually-thrilling Bloc Party back at Stubb's, but the outdoors didn't suit their show and despite goodwill from the crowd, they disappointed too. Finally, we queued to catch two songs from The Gossip. Thankfully one was "Standing In The Way Of Control" - cue Beth Ditto stripping off to her underwear, at which point I left for a much-needed beer at a late-night party. Drunk, I tried desperately to put to use my journalistic skills and 'rat out' the location of the fabled Smashing Pumpkins gig to no avail before wittering at one of The Horrors and passing out. A sore head and three hours sleep later on Friday and I was in search of something entirely new. I grabbed a breakfast burrito and buckled before Gallows, who restored my soul and purged the poison from my body. Frank Carter howled through their third show of the week whilst quickly amassing a crowd that octupled in 15minutes. All the way up at 17th Street was a party where I caught the buzz band of the week, Illinois. Sadly it was a long way to go for yet another North American indie band who wouldn't have made the cut for Uncut's recent "Wake Up" CD. Unremarkable. In search of glory I was determined to investigate some more tip-offs, Brazil's Bonde Du Role are funk-partyists who must be getting extra attention recently due to the successes of fellow countrymen CSS. Bopping to Bonde proved a sure-fire way to quickly sink two frozen margheritas in quick succesion, so punching the air in a jubilant (woozy, again) mood, I was ready for Yo! Majesty, a hip-hop trio from Florida. What followed was a seat of your pants exciting show which provided that 'this is what I came for' feeling. To end the week Willy Mason played in a nearby church, a worthy excuse to bring all that high-energy spirit back to base. Whereas his first album was recorded rough and songs were college-polished, his newer material hung together tightly. A last-ditch attempt to party in front of Albert Hammond Jr proved pointless and time was up, my dreams of Billy Corgan and James Iha in a glorious onstage embrace dashed."

I received an interesting message yesterday from SAm, responding to my preview of the forthcoming Elliott Smith album. "It bothers me a little bit to read, here and elsewhere, Elliott's 'strummed melodies' described as 'simple'," he writes. "Elliott was a good lyricist, a very good guitar player, and decent singer, but what makes him totally unique and superior to virtually all of his contemporaries is the melodic songwriting, the ingenuity and originality of the chord progressions. The formal problem that pop songs present is that they must be a)short b) instantly familiar and c) unfamiliar. It's an exercise in expectations ingeniously subverted and then met. "Go and play his songs on the guitar, or try to. I guarantee you will find in almost every one a sophisticated and basically amazing sequence of chords within the overall, conventional melodic structure - ie the difference between a good song and a boring one. It takes a certain kind of musical IQ to come up with that, something I've never detected in, say, Keith Richards, or the guy who writes the songs in Modest Mouse. OK, rant over." I've never played a guitar, or any instrument in fact, so I can't personally test out SAm's theory. It does strike me, though, as touching on a couple of fairly prickly subjects. One is about why Elliott Smith's music is so effective and, frequently, affecting. On the surface, he was a fairly conventional singer-songwriter, indebted - like so many others - to The Beatles, with a vague folkiness that comes to the fore on the solo acoustic songs on "New Moon". A casual listener might skip through a few of his albums and conclude his songs were even fairly samey. And certainly, Smith worked in a pretty narrow range. If we disregard the emotional impact of his words and voice for a moment, perhaps it is the "sophisticated and basically amazing sequence of chords within the overall, conventional melodic structure" that made his songs so powerful. Which brings us to the second slightly disturbing thought which SAm's email provoked. If a song is successful because of a technical melodic complexity which can only be identified by someone who tries to play it, does that mean that so much music journalism is based on hunches? Is Brian May right, and should I try and write my own songs before I've earned the right to criticise those of other people? I think the answer to that one is 'no', but of course I would say that. The overall impression that a record makes is more important and more interesting to read about, I reckon, than a musicological exposition. Part of the charm of Elliott Smith's songs is that they appear simple, that they create an illusion of direct, spontaneous emotional communication even though real craftsmanship underpins it. But maybe occasionally a look at the melodic nuts and bolts can give us an insight into what makes a song work? I'm going on a bit now. But anyway, we have one more report coming up from South By Southwest to come (tomorrow, hopefully). Other things to look forward to on Wild Mercury Sound soon: Mark E Smith and Mouse On Mars' stomping collaboration, Von Sudenfed; the garage glam of The 1990s; the medieval electronica of Colleen; the fantastic Marnie Stern; and, hopefully, previews of Bjork and The White Stripes. Just don't ask me to analyse their compositional skills. . .