Home Blog Page 564

David Bowie: “I’m hungry for reality!” – Part 1

0
In this exclusive interview from Uncut’s October 1999 issue – run across four parts – David Bowie looks back on 30 years of genius, drugs and derangement. Words: Chris Roberts _______________ David Bowie’s one of those people you travel to meet knowing that whatever agenda you have...

In this exclusive interview from Uncut’s October 1999 issue – run across four parts – David Bowie looks back on 30 years of genius, drugs and derangement. Words: Chris Roberts

_______________

David Bowie’s one of those people you travel to meet knowing that whatever agenda you have – perhaps to talk about his records, his images, his imaginings – he’ll unwittingly all but scupper it with a carpet-bombing charm offensive and voracious intellect. In the three times in the ’90s this writer has interviewed him prior to this meeting with Uncut, he’s zealously pontificated on Russian politics, the art of Johannesburg, chaos theory and the number of microchips in the average aeroplane. He’s done this while putting the journalist completely at ease with a matey approachability, yet revealing only tantalising fractions of “himself”. It takes resolve, and a temporary suffocation of the fan within, to bring him down to the level of talking about pop music, let alone who he is, who he once was, who he might still be.

When, in 1979, Valerie Singleton asked if the media’s tendency to view rock stars as a bit thick bothered him, he smiled and said, “Not at all. I’m very thick.” Which is just about the cleverest thing a rock star could ever say. He gets on well with Tony Blair now, and with prominent art historians; he jogs occasionally, and doesn’t drink. Two years ago, as the first big-league artist to float himself on the stock exchange – something of a move up, or towards the centre of things, from a tin can far above the world – he became debatably the richest British entertainer alive.

And yet this is the once coke-addled, gender-bending, demon-seeing, perhaps even Fascism-expounding paranoid egomaniac, who, after struggling determinedly for years, found global acclaim to be a royal screw-up, and perversely killed off each new persona just as it won love. This he repeated until he realised it was the sheddings, the acts of transformation, the rebirths, that were doing the winning. Until he realised that in pulling new identities out of himself he made us think we could pull new identities out of ourselves. Now a successful musician, actor, painter, sculptor and Internet guru, he can pursue whichever medium he pleases, as, with little to lose, the classic example of how to turn 50 and stay interesting. He is still revered by younger artists, his influence ubiquitous. Happily married, his self-esteem – rocky even throughout the years when “Bowie Is God” was graffitied on just about every suburban street wall – is settled and serene. He’s also manically busy and creative.

In the ’70s, Bowie co-opted shock value to become the most prominent and challenging of stars, then jettisoned it when everybody else caught up. He then introduced the glam generation to the joys of soul music, and forced the rock cognoscenti to concede that art wasn’t a dirty word. “There’s new wave, there’s old wave, and there’s David Bowie,” ran the slogan alongside one of the many zeitgeists he’s hurdled.

Bowie was the thinking person’s rock Messiah, an actor observing himself playing a role for which his parallel talents as a great singer and songwriter were uniquely suited, given his knack for the most agile appropriation and artifice. If he saw someone else doing something he liked, he’d do it better. If no-one else was doing it, he’d hold and hold and hold, then play his card at exactly the right moment to cause maximum subversion and sparkle. Although his more recent work has been as often merely eccentric as truly inspired, his charisma, as he cares less about it, grows. He plays it down, but you still know you’re meeting aristocracy.

All of which brings us to New York, on a fine August morning, at the Fifth Avenue offices of Virgin Records, at what’s the crack of dawn for me but probably halfway through the day for Bowie. The journalist is five minutes early; the artist is five minutes late. He’s doing things. He’s always doing things.

_______________

YOU’VE BEEN AROUND

Preparations for the legend’s arrival have been made. A dozen scented candles adorn the boardroom table and, more importantly, there’s a fresh pack of Marlboro Lights, a lighter, and an ashtray in every no-smoking room.

He glides in, long-haired in a heatwave, enthusiastically bearing a cassette. The hair throws you a little: how come this man never looks like his most recent photos? Tall, long-limbed, someone who strides, he’s wearing clothes which are so nondescript it’s remarkable; greyish-brown shirt and trousers.

“Hi”, he says, “Listen, can I just play you this?” He’s been remixing a track called “Seven” from his new album, hours…, and, like a kid in a new band, wants the nearest human being to hear it at once. On it goes, and I am placed in the only slightly surreal position of having to nod along approvingly to this world exclusive while steering clear of being a sycophantic twit. I like it. He likes it. “Lovely,” I go. “Yeah,” he grins.

Coffee is brought, and I check he’s aware that, as well as discussing the Bowie of ’99, we’re attempting – in our too brief allotted time – an overview, a retrospective look at his 30 years as a shape-shifting icon. Here’s what our most articulate, durable rock god says.

“Oh, fuck, shit. No, I didn’t know that. Ha, good luck! All right, I’ll try. OK.”

Thirty years as a superstar, I go, making it sound attractive. Bearing in mind that his 17 studio albums from 1969 to 1989 are re-released (again) this month. Thirty years as Major Tom, Ziggy Stardust, Aladdin Sane, Cracked Actor, Thin White Duke, Beep-beep Pierrot, mainstream crooner, bloke from Tin Machine, earthling, Cyber-seer, multi-millionaire . . .

“Thirty years as an occasional front cover,” he muses. “Heh heh. Well, this gives me the opportunity to now go out and get a spoon.”

A spoon?

“A spoon,” he says, furrowing his brow, “might affect my performance.”

David Bowie, one of the first rock stars to enter cyberspace with a vengeance, has learned to temper his obsession with the internet. He only plays with it at night now, or “the wife is out the door – zoom!” He has to be careful. She’ll say, “Are you ever coming to bed?” “Hold on just a minute,” he’ll plead. “Come and have a look at this, you won’t believe…” “No, I am not coming to have a look,” she’ll reply. “I’ll see it tomorrow. All right?” “But,” he’ll say, “it’s really incredible.” “I’m sure it’s incredible, darling,” she’ll sigh, “but please come to bed now.”

So what he does is he gets up at five AM and checks out his sites, makes sure everything’s up to scratch, till around nine or ten.

“There’s nobody about. Well, Iman’s about, but I mean in the outside world there’s nobody about.”

He hasn’t let it distract him from music too much. “I’m aware where the drugs are these days. I see ’em coming! They’re not all chemicals, y’know. I look at the screen, and think: this is a drug. I’ve gotta be careful with this, because I can get hooked ever so easily.” Through most of the ’70s, he admits, he was “cracked-up and broken… not on this planet”.

I ask what surprises him most about the way he’s perceived today, and he answers, “I guess I am what the greatest number of people think I am. And I have no control over that at all. This lot on Bowienet are quite funny and sarcastic – they’re not, like, goths, all serious and heavy. They do a lot of sending-up, which I like.”

They’re cheeky as much as reverential?

“Absolutely, yes. So there’s an awful lot of referencing ‘Laughing Gnome’ and Dame Bowie and all that.”

Which you’re OK with?

“Oh, God yeah! I had to get over that a long time ago.” He laughs the laugh of the happy. “But then as we all know, history is all revisionism. One makes one’s own history.”

_______________

HIS NAME WAS ALWAYS BUDDY, AND HE’D SHRUG . . .

It’s tough chaining Bowie to one subject at the best of times: he’s too interesting and interested. “I do this now,” he mentions, the second the tape recorder’s on. “So I know about the fears and horrors of not having enough batteries, the embarrassment of getting it to work in front of them.”

He’s been for some years conducting interviews for the publication, Modern Painters, beginning with former neighbour and fellow Swiss tax exile Balthus, moving through Lichtenstein to Hirst and Emin.

“I’ve done a lot, and I love it,” he says. “For me it’s far preferable being on that end of it. I’m interested in how artists work. The process. How they got where they got, why they’re like they are, how they do what they do. Those three things are what you want to find out about a person you admire. The most delightful experience recently was Jeff Koons, who I adored. He’s so ultimately American, a dream. Very sweet, simplistic, almost a naïve presence. Terrific company. I’ve not done anyone yet that I don’t admire, but I’ve got a couple coming up, and that’s gonna be odd. I suppose I ask the same questions, but how do I greet the answers? Should I get personal or remain objective? Is there room for editorial comment? What do I do if he’s a prick? An unctuous, obsequious prat?”

Pretend you’re a character in a play?

“But… it’s all theatre, y’know. Everything. I mean, even Springsteen’s theatre. Whether they like it or not. It’s a performance, an interpretation of something. That’s what it is. That’s what we do.”

Manhattan sirens blare through the window and Bowie half-turns his head for a second. When he turns back, the eyes do that thing, the David Bowie thing. Right, you think, that’s him.

“All we dysfunctional people who feel that it’s important for more than three people to know our opinion, that’s why we’re in this ‘music biz’. All the painters, all the anything else – it’s where all the nutcases go when they haven’t been locked up. They go into the arts. Because nobody in their right mind needs to tell hundreds or thousands of people what it is that they believe.”

Oh, it’s in everybody to some degree, that can-I-get-a-witness thing…

“Is it? Oh. So I’m one of the sane ones, you’re saying?”

David Bowie, who has studied and feared the topic of mental illness all his life, and whose estranged half-brother Terry committed suicide in 1985 (hence “Jump They Say” from 1993’s Black Tie White Noise, the first song he’d written about him since “The Bewlay Brothers”), finished mastering his new album yesterday. Simultaneously, he and collaborator Reeves Gabrels started writing some new tracks. This morning, he’s already chatted with Pete Townshend (“we see far too little of each other, he’s a lovely man”), with whom he bemoaned the fact that constant travelling, currently between New York and London in his case, means he keeps missing people. “It’s a shame: I’ve got to stop befriending nomads.”

You could keep still yourself for a few days.

“Yes,” he agrees, adopting mock Dame David accent. “Let them come to one.”

You’re relentlessly prolific.

“I know. Apart from one short time, I’ve never really suffered from blocks.”

This one short time was probably the crisis of confidence and direction after Let’s Dance and its tugboat sequels – Tonight (1984) and Never Let Me Down (1987) – rattled his cutting-edge credibility for the first time in nearly two decades. “I never try and analyse why that is, because it might cause me to have one. It freely flows out. Whether it’s writing, making music, or painting, I don’t have a problem that way. There’s always something happening. Probably because what others might have as time off, as relaxing time, I apply to working… I can’t be without doing something. I don’t take kindly to holidays; they’re forced sabbaticals.”

Indeed, Bowie’s work rate – for an alleged poseur – has always been the stuff of myth. Even at the height of his drug-induced crying jags and hallucinations and self-imposed isolation, he would pull 48-hour non-stop stints in the studio.

Does he feel a sense of guilt if he stops?

“Not guilty so much as irritable. I sit there stubbornly waiting for the sun to go down, mumbling, ‘Have you had enough of your holiday now? Can we go back and get on with things?’ My compromise is, if I’m not working, I’ll be inquisitive. I’ll make sure we go somewhere interesting, so that I can scavenge about and see if there’s anything I can take away with me that’ll become part of what I do. I guess I’m always looking for experience or titillation of some kind. I’m never still. I’m an itchy-crawly kind of guy. That’s why I like New York so much: there’s always something going on. I once asked David Byrne why he’d chosen to live here, and he said, ‘Um, because you look out of the window and someone falls down.’ Perfect.”

Before we blast through the past (and touch on such pop-trivia subjects as absolute truth, personal belief systems, self-abuse and, er, Sir Thomas More), we need to set Bowie’s new opus, hours… , in context. Outside (1995) found him back in touch with Brian Eno and getting in touch with his darkside again, tapping into the now over-familiar themes of pre-millennial angst and serial killer aggrandisation. Earthling (1997), a healthily ironic title, was a patchy drum’n’-bass experiment with what were probably then referred to as “the latest sounds”.

Yet hours… is Bowie in that rarest of guises: man singing songs, acknowledging bona fide emotions. (Contrary to lore, this is something he has done before: think “Be My Wife” from Low or “Can You Hear Me?” from Young Americans. Contenders such as Ziggy’s “Rock’n’Roll Suicide” were more distanced, considered . . .).

“It’s a more personal piece”, he says of his 20th solo studio album proper in 30 years, “but I hesitate to say it’s autobiographical. In a way, it self-evidently isn’t. I also hate to say it’s a ‘character’, so I have to be careful here. It is fiction. And the progenitor of this piece is obviously a man who is fairly disillusioned. He’s not a happy man. Whereas I am an incredibly happy man! So what I was trying to do, more than anything else, was capture some of the angst and feelings of… guys of my age. I’d say, broadly, it’s songs for my generation. People who’ve lived through the late ’60s, ’70s, and part of the ’80s… although the ’80s don’t really come into this album. It’s a long reach back, generally. I was trying to capture elements of how, often, one feels at this age.

“So it’s personal, but not some hybrid fantasy. There’s not much concept behind it. It’s really a bunch of songs, but I guess the one through-line is that they deal with a man looking back over his life.”

_______________

LIFE JUST KISSED YOU HELLO

This man, this narrator, definitely isn’t you?

“No, no – because there’s one song where I’m talking about how we’ve got to break this relationship up, y’know – and please don’t read things into that! My wife and I are extremely happy; I’d like to state quite publicly – haw, haw. But there was a time in my life where I was desperately in love with a girl – and I met her, as it happens, quite a number of years later. And boy, was the flame dead! So in this case on the album the guy’s thinking about a girl he knew many years ago, and she was ‘the great mistake he never made’. See, I know how that feels, but it’s not part of my current situation. I’m much too jolly. I’m inwardly jolly.”

So this isn’t you probing your heart and soul?

“God, right, let it pour out – aaargghh! No, not at all.” (I notice the straight teeth, not the fangs of photographic legend, which he resisted getting fixed for decades. He only gave in when they started giving him real pain.) “But it doesn’t mean I don’t take it seriously. I have friends who are in similar situations; I draw from people I know. I see what they’re going through, and think, God, if I could help them… but you can’t ever help somebody sort out their internal life. Never. Even if you know what’s wrong, you can’t tell ’em. You can give support, but they’ve got to do it themselves.”

Bowie, notoriously, married Angie Barnett in 1970. By their divorce 10 years later they were barely on speaking terms, and Bowie won custody of son Joe (aka: Duncan Zowie Bowie). Early on, however, many reckon Angie’s commitment to her husband’s lust for fame was admirable, and she was an essential motivator, contributing ideas to the crucial Ziggy look and presentation. Her bitch’n’tell book, Backstage Passes, is a self-serving, one-sided rant, fuelled by loathing for Corinne “Coco” Schwab, who replaced her as Bowie’s confidante and buffer from management hassles, but if even a 20th of it is true, Bowie’s bisexuality back then was no pose. It got every mixed-up teenager’s mother in a whirl.

Prior to the pugnacious Angie, Bowie had a long romance with a ballerina, Hermione Farthingale, the subject of “Letter To Hermione” from Space Oddity. His sexual appetites, while by no means latent before stardom, ballooned post-fame. “Not too many gay gods,” Marc Bolan once chuckled, “have slept with 5,000 chicks.” Later affairs included the Berlin transsexual, Romy Haag. A leaning towards black girls then seemed to usurp bisexuality. In the Eighties there was a serious, three-year relationship with Melissa Hurley, a dancer from the Glass Spider tour.

In 1990 he met Iman, and “started naming the babies on the first night”. He proposed on one knee on a boat cruising down the Seine in Paris on the first anniversary of their meeting. He agreed to an AIDS test and swore off all drugs. They married in 1992 in Lausanne. And again in Florence.

A recurring theme of the album seems to be: no regrets.

“Yes, that is from me. I don’t have regrets. If I am cajoled into looking at the past, which I do very infrequently, I tend to look on it as not so much luggage as… wings. My past has given me such a fantastic life. A lot of it negative, a lot positive. For me it’s been an incredible learning process, arriving now at a situation where I… know far far less than I knew when I started out!

“There again, nobody knows more than a young person knows. I knew so much when I was about 25. I had an answer for everything, knew all the answers…”

_______________

FUTURE LEGEND

Even before reaching that ripe old age, David Robert Jones, born in Brixton in 1947, had asked a few questions. Quickly shuffling off the mortal trappings of a fractious, working-class family, his early mods’n’sods bands included The King Bees, The Manish Boys and The Lower Third.

Changing his name to avoid confusion with The Monkees’ singer, he released a loopy, self-titled 1967 album and numerous flop singles, riddled with music hall structures and Anthony Newley vocal mannerisms, while dabbling in folk, mime, acting, dance, Buddhism and the obligatory bohemian lifestyle.

In 1969, he finally forged a hit with “Space Oddity”, inspired by Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey and helped by the Apollo moon landing broadcast. The sister album was the work of a trippy hippie, but the chameleon was just waking up, unfurling the flag.

People sometimes forget just how many records the little bombardier made before hitting big fame…

“And unfortunately they were all released! I mean, I must’ve had 743 singles come out before ‘Space Oddity’. And half of them daft as a brush. And the other half – well, there may have been potential, but only so much. Ha!

“But it’s kinda fun now, actually – I see sites on the Internet where they study those areas very intimately. You can see them picking through the peppercorns of my manure pile. Looking for something that might indicate I had a future. They’re few and far between, but they have come up with some nuggets.”

“So yes, the whole of my learning period is all out there, all released. It took me an awful long time to work out what it was that I did. I guess what made it so difficult was that I was never in love with one kind of music and one kind of music only. At that point, particularly, it wasn’t ‘right’ to have an interest in all areas. It was make-your-mind-up time. You were either a folk singer or a rock singer or a blues guitarist… you were a thing, and you could definitely say that’s what you were. Now, that kind of singular craft seems almost quaint. This TV show came on the other day and it was, like, Mountain, Fleetwood Mac, Joe Walsh… and I thought, God, that approach to music seems so incredibly out of step now. And I think I felt that back then! I felt: well, I don’t wanna be like this. I wanna keep my options open; there’s lots of things I like. So it was: ‘How can I do this so I can try everything? How can I be really greedy?’”

David Bowie: “I’m hungry for reality!” – Part 2

David Bowie: “I’m hungry for reality!” – Part 3

David Bowie: “I’m hungry for reality!” – Part 4

Bob Dylan releases The 50th Anniversary Collection

0
Bob Dylan has released a 50th Anniversary collection in Europe only. According to Rolling Stone, around 100 copies of the four-CD, 86 track set featuring studio outtakes and live material recorded by Dylan in 1962 have been released. The set was designed to copyright the material under new Europea...

Bob Dylan has released a 50th Anniversary collection in Europe only.

According to Rolling Stone, around 100 copies of the four-CD, 86 track set featuring studio outtakes and live material recorded by Dylan in 1962 have been released.

The set was designed to copyright the material under new European laws, a source at Sony Music told Rolling Stone. “The copyright law in Europe was recently extended from 50 to 70 years for everything recorded in 1963 and beyond. With everything before that, there’s a new ‘Use It or Lose It’ provision. It basically said, ‘If you haven’t used the recordings in the first 50 years, you aren’t going to get any more.'”

“The whole point of copyrighting this stuff is that we intend to do something with it at some point in the future,” says the source, alluding to the ongoing Bootleg Series project. “But it wasn’t the right time to do it right after he released Tempest. There are other things we want to do in 2013 though.”

Approximately 100 copies of The 50th Anniversary Collection were available through record stores in France, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Fans were also allowed to download the collection for 100 Euros from Dylan’s website.

Rolling Stone reports that copies are changing hands for $1,000 on eBay.

The tracklisting for The 50th Anniversary Collection is:

Disc 1

Going Down To New Orleans (Take 1)

Going Down To New Orleans (Take 2)

Sally Gal (Take 2)

Sally Gal (Take 3)

Rambling Gambling Willie (Take 1)

Rambling Gambling Willie (Take 3)

Corrina, Corrina (Take 1)

Corrina, Corrina (Take 2)

The Death Of Emmett Till (Take 1)

(I Heard That) Lonesome Whistle (Take 2)

Rocks And Gravel (Solid Road) (Take 3)

Sally Gal (Take 4)

Sally Gal (Take 5)

Baby, Please Don’t Go (Take 1)

Baby, Please Don’t Go (Take 3)

Milk Cow (Calf’s) Blues (Good Morning Blues) (Take 1)

Milk Cow (Calf’s) Blues (Good Morning Blues) (Take 3)

Wichita Blues (Going To Louisiana) (Take 1)

Wichita Blues (Going To Louisiana) (Take 2)

Milk Cow (Calf’s) Blues (Good Morning Blues) (Take 4)

Wichita Blues (Going To Louisiana) (Take 2)

Baby, I’m In The Mood For You (Take 2)

Blowin’ In The Wind (Take 1)

Blowin’ In The Wind (Take 2)

Worried Blues (Take 1)

Baby, I’m In The Mood For You (Take 4)

Disc 2

Bob Dylan’s Blues (Take 2)

Bob Dylan’s Blues (Take 3)

Corrina, Corrina (Take 2)

Corrina, Corrina (Take 3)

That’s All Right, Mama (Take 1)

That’s All Right, Mama (Take 3)

That’s All Right, Mama (Take 5)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 3)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 5)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 6)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 7)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 9)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 10)

Mixed Up Confusion (Take 11)

That’s All Right, Mama (Take 3)

Rocks And Gravels (Solid Road) (Take 2)

Ballad Of Hollis Brown (Take 2)

Kingsport Town (Take 1)

When Death Comes Creepin’ (Whatcha Gonna Do?) (Take 1)

Hero Blues (Take 1)

When Death Comes Creepin’ (Whatcha Gonna Do?) (Take 1)

I Shall Be Free (Take 3)

I Shall Be Free (Take 5)

Hero Blues (Take 2)

Hero Blues (Take 4)

Disc 3

Hard Times In New York Town (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

The Death Of Emmett Till (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

I Rode Out One Morning (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

House Of The Rising Sun (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

See That My Grave Is Kept Clean (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

Ballad Of Donald White (Mackenzie Home Tapes)

Honey, Just Allow Me One More Chance (Gerde’s Folk City)

Talkin’ New York (Gerde’s Folk City)

Corrina, Corrina (Gerde’s Folk City)

Deep Ellum Blues (Gerde’s Folk City)

Blowin’ In The Wind (Gerde’s Folk City)

The Death Of Emmett Till (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Stealin’ (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Hiram Hubbard (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Blowin’ In The Wind (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Rocks And Gravel (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Quit Your Low Down Ways (Finjan Club, Montreal)

He Was A Friend Of Mine (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Let Me Die In My Footsteps (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Two Trains Runnin’ (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Ramblin’ On My Mind (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Muleskinner Blues (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Muleskinner Blues (Part 2) (Finjan Club, Montreal)

Disc 4

Sally Gal (Carnegie Hall Hootenanny)

Highway 51 (Carnegie Hall Hootenanny)

Talking John Birch Paranoid Blues (Carnegie Hall Hootenanny)

Ballad Of Hollis Brown (Carnegie Hall Hootenanny)

A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall (Carnegie Hall Hootenanny)

See That My Grave Is Kept Clean (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

No More Auction Block (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Motherless Children (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Kind Hearted Woman Blues (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Black Cross (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Ballad Of Hollis Brown (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Ain’t No More Cane (The Gaslight Café, NYC)

Thom Yorke’s Atoms For Peace unveil studio version of ‘Judge Jury and Executioner’ – listen

0
Atoms For Peace have debuted the studio version of their song, "Judge Jury and Executioner". The track – which was first played live in 2009 in Los Angeles - was aired on Zane Lowe's BBC Radio 1 show last night [January 7]. Click below to hear the song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4tW3mhp9io...

Atoms For Peace have debuted the studio version of their song, “Judge Jury and Executioner”.

The track – which was first played live in 2009 in Los Angeles – was aired on Zane Lowe’s BBC Radio 1 show last night [January 7]. Click below to hear the song.

Atoms For Peace are Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke’s side project with Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers, super-producer Nigel Godrich and percussionist Mauro Refosco. They release their debut album Amok on February 25 via XL.

Thom Yorke and Nigel Godrich spoke to Zane Lowe before playing “Judge Jury and Executioner”. They discussed the possibility of UK concerts, during which they confirmed that they would be playing shows in the UK and Europe, but that they didn’t know when. “It’s still being figured out,” said Nigel. “It’s on the table.”

When asked if they’d be playing this summer’s Glastonbury Festival, Yorke said that they wouldn’t. “We won’t have got our shit together by then,” he explained.

Lowe then asked if fans would ever be hear the songs Radiohead recorded at Jack White’s studio in Nashville last year. Yorke said yes, but that: “It’s in the mountain of stuff that I’ve got to finish… first I’ve got to get the kids from school.”

The Making Of David Bowie’s “Starman”

0
Producer Ken Scott, drummer Mick ‘Woody’ Woodmansey and photographer Mick Rock are among the key players who recall the making of Bowie's 1972 hit, "Starman". This originally appeared in Uncut Take 145. You’ve no idea how much trouble we had getting exposure before Ziggy,” says David Bow...

Producer Ken Scott, drummer Mick ‘Woody’ Woodmansey and photographer Mick Rock are among the key players who recall the making of Bowie’s 1972 hit, “Starman”. This originally appeared in Uncut Take 145.

You’ve no idea how much trouble we had getting exposure before Ziggy,” says David Bowie’s ex-wife, Angie. “It was a constant slog uphill. People didn’t want to know us. David had been knocking his head against the wall as a folk singer, then he decided he needed a band.”

It’s easy to forget this, but in the summer of 1972, David Bowie was best known as the strange kid with the curly perm who’d scored a novelty hit three years earlier with “Space Oddity”. Now here he was as alien rock star Ziggy Stardust, with a quilted jumpsuit, lace-up boots and neon-coloured hair. Inspired by ’50s rock’n’roll, Marc Bolan, TS Eliot, Vince Taylor, A Clockwork Orange and Japanese kabuki theatre, it’s fair to say that Ziggy was a more ambitious proposition than Bowie’s folkier incarnation. “I packaged a totally credible, plastic rock’n’roll singer,” he said later. “Much better than The Monkees could ever fabricate.”

With guitarist Mick Ronson, bassist Trevor Bolder and drummer Woody Woodmansey, Bowie recorded The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars in late 1971 and early 1972. A modestly attended UK tour followed that February. But two key moments around the …Ziggy album release in June helped turn Bowie into a puissant rock star.

The first was on June 17, at Oxford Town Hall, when photographer Mick Rock snapped Bowie performing an ‘electric blow-job’ on Ronson’s guitar. Then, on July 6, the Spiders played “Starman” on Top Of The Pops, and Bowie – striking in his rainbow coloured suit and androgynous make-up – draped an arm limply across Ronson’s shoulder. The performance inspired a generation of musicians, and “Starman” peaked at No 10, while Ziggy itself stayed in the album charts for two years. Bowie never looked back. “[Starman] is four minutes and ten seconds of major achievement,” John Peel wrote in Disc. “Jesus, it feels good.”

ROB HUGHES

__________________________

Ken Scott, producer: I’d worked with David on Space Oddity and The Man Who Sold The World, and always thought, ‘Yes, he was a nice guy and relatively talented.’ But a superstar? Never. But after he’d asked me to co-produce Hunky Dory with him, his publisher and myself were over at my house going through the demos and it dawned on me for the first time that this guy could be a superstar.

Angie Bowie: They made a great job of Hunky Dory, but …Ziggy Stardust was when the band came together in a way that everyone had their chops down. And Mick Ronson started to emerge as this amazing guitarist. The band would come over to our place at Haddon Hall and go down into the basement to rehearse. They more or less lived there. [Fashion designer] Freddie Buretti worked for this Greek tailor called Andreas, so I’d brought Freddie and his girlfriend, Daniella [Parmar], down to Haddon Hall. David and Freddie then got together and designed those outfits for the Ziggy Stardust thing. David designed the bomber jackets and the tight-fitting pants with the lace-up boots. I bought a lot of clothes for myself, but kind of laid them out in a way that, if David nicked them and wore them, it might not be a bad idea.

Mick ‘Woody’ Woodmansey, drums: The whole Bowie and the Spiders look was David’s idea. We’d watched A Clockwork Orange, seen Alice Cooper live and it was a fusion that fitted the whole space/alien concept. At first we were very reticent about the outfits and the make-up. Mick Ronson hated the outfits. In fact, he packed his bags and left. David asked me to go after him and handle it. I spent a good hour or so on Beckenham train station with him!

Scott: [Laughing] I look at pictures of them these days and feel so bad about being a part of it! But hey, it suited the times. When it all came down, it was, ‘Wow, this is great! This is really adding something to the recording, bringing a sense of spectacle to it all.’ Looking back on it, I mean, my God, what were we thinking? But it really caught on after a while. The …Ziggy sessions started just a few weeks after we’d finished Hunky Dory [September to November 1971]. David came up to me and said: “Right, we’re going to record another album. But I don’t think you’re going to like this one as much, ’cause it’s more rock’n’roll.” All of those sessions were the same: the band would quickly learn a song, we’d get it in a couple of takes, we’d do some overdubs and it was done.

Woodmansey: There had been one or two tracks on Hunky Dory where I’d given poor Ken Scott a bit of verbal abuse about the sound, saying, “I could get a better sound out of a bag of crisps and a cornflake packet!” When we turned up to do …Ziggy, they asked me to go down in the studio and check if the drums were set up correctly. When I got there, there was no kit. Instead, in the middle of the floor was a cornflake packet, two coffee cups and a bag of crisps, all mic’d up properly and a pair of sticks lying beside them. All the band and crew were falling around in hysterics.

Scott: It was actually all different-sized cornflake packets. You could get mini ones and big ones, so I sent the tea boy out to get as many different sizes as he could. Then myself and the roadie set them up, exactly like a drum kit. Woody walked in and just fell on the floor. We went back into the studio to do “Starman” in January ’72, after we’d done the rest of the album. Someone at RCA had told us: “There’s no single. Go back in and do one.” It came together very quickly, though, maybe in just one day.

Woodmansey: “Starman” was along the same lines as “Space Oddity” and “Life On Mars”, two other favourites of mine. It’s the concept of hope that the song communicates. That “we’re not alone” and “they” contact the kids, not the adults, and kind of say “get on with it”. “Let the children boogie”: it’s music and rock’n’roll! It made the future look better.

Scott: Mick Ronson did the arrangements for strings and guitar. That morse code sound is actually a piano and two guitars, an octave apart, then we bounced them all down together to make one track. It seemed to make sense in that there was this idea of something coming from some distant planet. So we then put it all through a phaser. There is one weird thing about it that I’ll bring up. There are two versions of “Starman”: one a loud morse code version and one a quiet version. And I only ever remember doing one mix of it, and can’t tell you which was the one I did. I’ve no idea where the second one came from. So if anyone reading this can come up with an answer, let me know!

Mick Rock: I think David saw “Starman” as the ultimate follow-up to “Space Oddity”, which had been a hit in ’69. But you can see all that ‘star’ stuff he was projecting like mad then: “Starman”; “Prettiest Star”; “Moonage Daydream”. He wanted it bad, he really did. At one point when I was interviewing him he said: “Y’know, I’m so focused on what I’m doing, Mick, that if you were to come and tell me my best friend had just died, I’d probably say, ‘Oh, that’s really sad’, then go right back to work.” That was how he thought of himself. It was important for him to be a star. People forget that Ziggy Stardust was all projection, because he wasn’t a star at the moment he recorded the single and the album. “Starman” was the set-up. That song was the reason there were a thousand people at Oxford Town Hall [June 1972].

Angie Bowie: Mick Rock was moving around at the side of the stage that night. After a while he jumped down and started taking shots. Then there was a break in one song and I saw David walk away from the mic, go to the back of the stage, turn around and kind of look at Mick. Ronno was playing away and not paying any attention. Mick Rock didn’t know what the hell he meant, but he sort of concentrated.

Rock: David didn’t pre-warn me about that shot. He told me later that he wasn’t actually intending to go down on his knees. And if you see the actual shot, he’s not; his feet are splayed. All he was trying to do was bite Mick’s guitar. But the way Mick was swinging his guitar around, David had to take up that position. Maybe it’s the delicate way he’s clutching Mick’s cheeks that caused the fuss.

Angie Bowie: David looked like he was helping him play it with his mouth. It was brilliant. Then I saw flash flash flash! Five flashes in a row from Mick Rock. Those things are gifts.

Rock: I was at the perfect spot at the perfect moment. It was too late to get it in the papers, so David and the management actually bought a page in Melody Maker to say thank you to his rising fans. The timing couldn’t have been better. Of all the shots of him, this is the one that lingers longest in the memory. It’s an incredibly durable image. Then, after that, the audiences grew very fast. By the London Rainbow gigs in August, he did two nights, which he obviously couldn’t have done before “Starman”. That song fuelled everything.

Woodmansey: “Starman” was the first Bowie song since “Space Oddity” that had mass appeal. It spearheaded the whole Ziggy Stardust concept both musically and visually. Appearing on Top Of The Pops was like reaching the summit of Everest. I recall waiting to go on, standing in a corridor, and Status Quo were opposite us. We were dressed in our clothes and they had on their trademark denim. Francis Rossi looked at me and said: “Shit, you make us feel old.” The success of ‘Starman’ really opened it all up for us. Everything changed.

David Bowie releases first new material in 10 years

0
David Bowie has released a new single, "Where Are We Now?", this morning [January 8 - Bowie's birthday]. You can watch the video below. The single will be followed on March 12 by THE NEXT DAY, Bowie's first new album in 10 years and his 30th studio recording. It has been produced by Tony Visconti....

David Bowie has released a new single, “Where Are We Now?“, this morning [January 8 – Bowie’s birthday].

You can watch the video below.

The single will be followed on March 12 by THE NEXT DAY, Bowie’s first new album in 10 years and his 30th studio recording. It has been produced by Tony Visconti.

The track listing for THE NEXT DAY is:

The Next Day

Dirty Boys

The Stars (Are Out Tonight)

Love Is Lost

Where Are We Now?

Valentine’s Day

If You Can See Me

I’d Rather Be High

Boss Of Me

Dancing Out In Space

How Does The Grass Grow

(You Will) Set The World On Fire

You Feel So Lonely You Could Die

Heat

So She (Bonus Track)

I’ll Take You There (Bonus Track)

Plan (Bonus Track)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOyDTy9DtHQ

You can also read the first part of our mammoth 1999 interview with Bowie on Uncut.co.uk now – check back each day this week for more.

George Clinton ordered to pay off $1million debt with copyright to four songs

0
George Clinton has lost the rights to four of his songs after being ordered to hand the copyright over as payment of a $1million debt. Clinton owed the money to his former lawyers, the Hendricks & Lewis law firm, who represented him between 2005 and 2008. In 2010, Hendricks & Lewis won a $1...

George Clinton has lost the rights to four of his songs after being ordered to hand the copyright over as payment of a $1million debt.

Clinton owed the money to his former lawyers, the Hendricks & Lewis law firm, who represented him between 2005 and 2008. In 2010, Hendricks & Lewis won a $1.5million case against Clinton after claiming he had failed to pay back their fees but a new court case found that Clinton only paid back $340,000 of that amount. Subsequently, a federal judge ordered that Clinton must hand over the copyrights to four of his songs in lieu of payment.

The songs in question were ‘Hardcore Jollies’, ‘The Electric Spanking Of War Babies’, ‘Uncle Jam Wants You’ and ‘One Nation Under A Groove‘. TMZ reports that Hendricks & Lewis will be able to sell or use Clinton’s music however it wants. However, once they have made $1.5million from the songs the copyrights return to Clinton.

In 2011, George Clinton became involved in a lawsuit with Black Eyed Peas after accusing them of using his music without permission.

Pic credit: Guy Eppel

Rare photos of The Beatles’ 1964 US tour up for auction

0

A series of 65 unpublished colour photographs of The Beatles during their 1964 sell-out US tour are to be auctioned. The slides will go under the hammer at Omega Auctions in Stockport, Cheshire on March 22, which marks 50 years since the band released their debut LP Please Please Me, the BBC reports. They will be sold along with the copyright and are expected to fetch between £10,000 and £15,000. The photographs were taken by physicist Dr Robert Beck. The inventor and researcher died in 2002 and left a large archive of photographs and slides in his Hollywood home. Most colour photographs of the band in the US did not appear until later in 1965. Dr Beck's slides include pictures of George Harrison with his red Rickenbacker guitar, which appeared in the film A Hard Day's Night as well as close-up portraits of the band at the Las Vegas Sahara Hotel press conference, the Las Vegas Convention Centre gig, plus images of a party at the Beverly Hills mansion of the then president of Capitol Records, Alan Livingston. Last November, a collage by artist Sir Peter Blake used for the insert in The Beatles' Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band fetched more than £50,000 at auction.

A series of 65 unpublished colour photographs of The Beatles during their 1964 sell-out US tour are to be auctioned.

The slides will go under the hammer at Omega Auctions in Stockport, Cheshire on March 22, which marks 50 years since the band released their debut LP Please Please Me, the BBC reports. They will be sold along with the copyright and are expected to fetch between £10,000 and £15,000.

The photographs were taken by physicist Dr Robert Beck. The inventor and researcher died in 2002 and left a large archive of photographs and slides in his Hollywood home. Most colour photographs of the band in the US did not appear until later in 1965.

Dr Beck’s slides include pictures of George Harrison with his red Rickenbacker guitar, which appeared in the film A Hard Day’s Night as well as close-up portraits of the band at the Las Vegas Sahara Hotel press conference, the Las Vegas Convention Centre gig, plus images of a party at the Beverly Hills mansion of the then president of Capitol Records, Alan Livingston.

Last November, a collage by artist Sir Peter Blake used for the insert in The Beatles’ Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band fetched more than £50,000 at auction.

‘New’ Jimi Hendrix song receives radio debut

0

A brand new Jimi Hendrix single "Somewhere" was played on the radio for the first time this morning (Jan 7). The track, which will be released as part of People, Hell & Angels, the forthcoming album of previously unreleased studio recordings, was played by DJ Shaun Keaveny on his BBC 6Music programme. The album will be released on March 4, 2013 and features 12 'new' songs, which see Hendrix experimenting with horns, keyboards, percussion and a second guitar. You can hear a version of "Somewhere" on the official Jimi Hendrix website alongside an interview with producer Eddie Kramer. The tracklisting for People, Hell & Angels is: 'Earth Blues' 'Somewhere' 'Hear My Train A Comin'' 'Bleeding Heart' 'Let Me Move You' 'Izabella' 'Easy Blues' 'Crash Landing' 'Inside Out' 'Hey Gypsy Boy' 'Mojo Man' 'Villanova Junction Blues' The tracks were recorded in 1968 and 1969.

A brand new Jimi Hendrix single “Somewhere” was played on the radio for the first time this morning (Jan 7).

The track, which will be released as part of People, Hell & Angels, the forthcoming album of previously unreleased studio recordings, was played by DJ Shaun Keaveny on his BBC 6Music programme.

The album will be released on March 4, 2013 and features 12 ‘new’ songs, which see Hendrix experimenting with horns, keyboards, percussion and a second guitar.

You can hear a version of “Somewhere” on the official Jimi Hendrix website alongside an interview with producer Eddie Kramer.

The tracklisting for People, Hell & Angels is:

‘Earth Blues’

‘Somewhere’

‘Hear My Train A Comin”

‘Bleeding Heart’

‘Let Me Move You’

‘Izabella’

‘Easy Blues’

‘Crash Landing’

‘Inside Out’

‘Hey Gypsy Boy’

‘Mojo Man’

‘Villanova Junction Blues’

The tracks were recorded in 1968 and 1969.

Purling Hiss: “Water On Mars”

0

Could be wrong about this, but I think the track I posted and tweeted most often last year was “Sunshine, No Shoes” by the Philadelphia band, Spacin’: I’m going to add it again after the jump. Spacin’, to recap - though you can follow this link to a blog about them - are a project fronted by Jason Killinger, a spin-off from a longish-established Philly psych band called Birds Of Maya; BOM’s amazing “Ready To Howl” album got a belated UK release last year on Agitated. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNtjlzw0yOw If I remember this right, Killinger isn’t so keen on touring, which in some way compelled his Birds Of Maya sparring partner Mike Pollize to find other gainful employment, as a live auxiliary member of The War On Drugs, and as the pivot of his own frenzied power trio, Purling Hiss. Purling Hiss released a glut of terrific sub-fi records in 2011, which I eulogised at length here. Last year, though, I don’t recall much surfacing beyond one track, “Lolita”, which provided a tantalising glimpse of how Pollize’s ferocious songs might sound if he was lured into an actual recording studio and encouraged to strip away some of the fuzz. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aCOYpWYtig “Lolita”, it now transpires, is the opening track on “Water On Mars”, Purling Hiss’ first album for Drag City, and one which might well interest those of you who’ve followed the career of Pollize’s new labelmate Ty Segall over the past couple of years. “Lolita”, as you’ve hopefully heard by now, is a lurching garage screecher that suggests at least some familiarity with “Bleach”-era Nirvana, and plenty of “Water On Mars” feels to hark back to a certain late ‘80s sound rather than the wilder psych-punk that dominated the earlier Hiss records. A bunch of tracks, in fact, could plausibly be passed off as lost Fort Apache sessions from that time; there’s a real Boston/Massachusetts vibe to the likes of, say, “Rat Race” (I keep thinking of Dinosaur Jr circa “The Wagon”) or “Dead Again” (a dissolute strum reminiscent of Evan Dando just before “It’s A Shame About Ray”). Pollize’s other Purling Hiss records have mixed up the racket with some massively accessible tunes – check this one, the fantastic “Run From The City”… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C84r_jPOVAQ … and there are jams and skrees here, too, on “Face Down” and the extended title track. Mostly, though, “Water On Mars” feels like the American underground have thrown up another garage free spirit who, like Segall and Kurt Vile in recent years, has the chops and tunes and, now, relative discipline to get across to a substantially bigger crowd. Good album; be interesting to see how it shapes up. Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnRMulvey Picture: Tiffany Yoon

Could be wrong about this, but I think the track I posted and tweeted most often last year was “Sunshine, No Shoes” by the Philadelphia band, Spacin’: I’m going to add it again after the jump. Spacin’, to recap – though you can follow this link to a blog about them – are a project fronted by Jason Killinger, a spin-off from a longish-established Philly psych band called Birds Of Maya; BOM’s amazing “Ready To Howl” album got a belated UK release last year on Agitated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNtjlzw0yOw

If I remember this right, Killinger isn’t so keen on touring, which in some way compelled his Birds Of Maya sparring partner Mike Pollize to find other gainful employment, as a live auxiliary member of The War On Drugs, and as the pivot of his own frenzied power trio, Purling Hiss.

Purling Hiss released a glut of terrific sub-fi records in 2011, which I eulogised at length here. Last year, though, I don’t recall much surfacing beyond one track, “Lolita”, which provided a tantalising glimpse of how Pollize’s ferocious songs might sound if he was lured into an actual recording studio and encouraged to strip away some of the fuzz.

“Lolita”, it now transpires, is the opening track on “Water On Mars”, Purling Hiss’ first album for Drag City, and one which might well interest those of you who’ve followed the career of Pollize’s new labelmate Ty Segall over the past couple of years. “Lolita”, as you’ve hopefully heard by now, is a lurching garage screecher that suggests at least some familiarity with “Bleach”-era Nirvana, and plenty of “Water On Mars” feels to hark back to a certain late ‘80s sound rather than the wilder psych-punk that dominated the earlier Hiss records.

A bunch of tracks, in fact, could plausibly be passed off as lost Fort Apache sessions from that time; there’s a real Boston/Massachusetts vibe to the likes of, say, “Rat Race” (I keep thinking of Dinosaur Jr circa “The Wagon”) or “Dead Again” (a dissolute strum reminiscent of Evan Dando just before “It’s A Shame About Ray”).

Pollize’s other Purling Hiss records have mixed up the racket with some massively accessible tunes – check this one, the fantastic “Run From The City”…

… and there are jams and skrees here, too, on “Face Down” and the extended title track. Mostly, though, “Water On Mars” feels like the American underground have thrown up another garage free spirit who, like Segall and Kurt Vile in recent years, has the chops and tunes and, now, relative discipline to get across to a substantially bigger crowd. Good album; be interesting to see how it shapes up.

Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnRMulvey

Picture: Tiffany Yoon

MIA claims record label delayed new album for being ‘too positive’

0
MIA has claimed that the release of her new album was delayed by her US record label for being "too positive". The singer, who last year released the single "Bad Girls", was due to release her fourth album Matangi in late 2012. However, speaking to Australian newspaper Gold Coast Bulletin, she reve...

MIA has claimed that the release of her new album was delayed by her US record label for being “too positive”.

The singer, who last year released the single “Bad Girls”, was due to release her fourth album Matangi in late 2012. However, speaking to Australian newspaper Gold Coast Bulletin, she revealed that Interscope were not quite convinced by her work and were hoping for something a little different. “It’s due in April, which is the Tamil new year – April 15th – and I’m still working on it,” she said.

Stating that she had been told to “darken it up a bit”, MIA went on to discuss exactly what the label had said to her, stating: “I thought I’d finished it. I finished it and then I handed the record in, like a couple of months ago. It’s like ‘We just built you up as the public enemy No. 1 and now you’re coming out with all this positive stuff.”

Speaking last year at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the singer and rapper explained that the title of her next album refers to her own birth name, Mathangi, and also a Hindu wisdom goddess.

MIA told the audience that she was about to go to India “to add more stuff” to the album and added of the record: “It’s not ‘I want to be trendy’. I just want to make music that makes sense.”

Earlier in the same year MIA described her next album as sounding like Paul Simon “on acid”. The singer made the comment on Twitter, after telling fans she would answer questions about the follow-up to 2010’s Maya.

When asked how many tracks would feature on the new album, she said: “It’s still in the making – could be five it could be 15 depends on what sounds good in my bro’s car.” She added that there would be no collaborations on the record.

Paul Weller: ‘No way will The Jam ever reunite’

0
Paul Weller has confirmed that he will never reform The Jam as "it would be absurd". The Modfather said he admires bands like The Rolling Stones who keep rocking into their late-sixties but admits he couldn't do it, as he doesn't want to be performing songs that are over 30 years old. He told The ...

Paul Weller has confirmed that he will never reform The Jam as “it would be absurd”.

The Modfather said he admires bands like The Rolling Stones who keep rocking into their late-sixties but admits he couldn’t do it, as he doesn’t want to be performing songs that are over 30 years old.

He told The Sun: “I take my hat off to people like the Stones but it’s not for me. I couldn’t do that. Jagger is brilliant and long may he rock. I couldn’t make my career out of old songs, it would do my head in.”

Weller has reportedly turned down millions in the past to reunite The Jam, who split up in 1982, with drummer Rick Buckler and bassist Bruce Foxton, but it doesn’t look likely that money will ever change his mind.

“We haven’t had 30 years of us continuing making lousy records, which is the case for some bands,” he continued. “No way would it happen. You can’t recapture those things, and also why should you? It would be absurd – three 50-year-old geezers jumping around the stage.”

Meanwhile, Paul Weller recently told NME that he has “just started getting excited” about indie music again. “It’s been shit for the last few years,” he said. “But there’s just a few bands I’ve heard who seem to be doing it for the right reasons.”

He added: “I loved the Palma Violets single, and I keep hearing a load of different things that are turning me on. I saw that band The Strypes recently and it was just, ‘Wow’. The guitarist is fucking amazing. Really raised my game that did.”

Suede release new song ‘Barriers’ as free download

0
Suede have given fans new song "Barriers" as a free download today (Jan 7). The track is the first to be heard from the band's brand new studio album, which will be titled Bloodsports. Bloodsports will be Suede's sixth studio album and their first since 2002. "Barriers" is the first song to be lift...

Suede have given fans new song “Barriers” as a free download today (Jan 7). The track is the first to be heard from the band’s brand new studio album, which will be titled Bloodsports.

Bloodsports will be Suede’s sixth studio album and their first since 2002. “Barriers” is the first song to be lifted from the album, due out in March, and is available from their official website now. An official single, titled “It Starts and Ends With You”, is due for release in February.

Speaking about the new Suede material, frontman Brett Anderson tells NME: “After a year of sweating and bleeding over the record it’s finally finished so we wanted to get some music out there as soon as we could. ‘Barriers’ isn’t the first single but we are proud enough of it to just chuck it out there and thought that its pulsing, romantic swell somehow summed up the feel of the album quite nicely. The album is called Bloodsports. It’s about lust, it’s about the chase, it’s about the endless carnal game of love. It was possibly the hardest we ever made but certainly is the most satisfying. it’s ten furious song for me have reclaimed for me what Suede was always about: drama, melody and noise.”

Suede will also perform a huge London show at Alexandra Palace to coincide with the release of Bloodsports in March. The band will headline the venue on Saturday, March 30. Tickets are available now.

Hawkwind – Space Ritual

0

The psychedelic warlords' live masterpiece reissued... A recent Notes & Queries in The Guardian asked if any band had lasted as long as Hawkwind while having such little success. Hawkwind fans will have spotted the flaw in the question. Because of course there are no sales graphs or probability equations in space; merely spiral galaxies, golden voids and apocalyptic warnings. “Do not panic... small babies may be placed inside special cocoons and should be left if possible in shelters.” For Hawkwind, ‘success’ was getting the drugs over the border. All the same, there have been important years in Hawkwind’s history, and 1972 was one of them. “Silver Machine” was an unexpected monster hit that summer, and a strong studio album (Doremi Fasol Latido) followed in November. To promote it, Hawkwind unveiled a new live act that combined hypnotic space-rock with a Liquid Len lightshow, a sci-fi storyline and a trio of interpretive dancers, including the towering, topless Stacia. Hawkwind’s line-up – possibly their best ever – comprised Nik Turner (wah-wah sax and flute), Dave Brock (guitar, vocals), Lemmy (bass, vocals), the duo of Dik Mik and Del Dettmar (synthesisers and electronics), thunder-drummer Simon King and the remarkable Robert Calvert, whose chilling announcements were crucial to maintaining a red-alert atmosphere. “Do not panic,” he urged, like a cosmic Corporal Jones. “You have only a few seconds to escape. Use those seconds sensibly or you will inevitably die.” God help anyone who saw the show on bad acid. The double live album Space Ritual, which celebrates its 40th anniversary this year, was recorded at Liverpool Stadium and the Brixton Sundown in December 1972. Lasting a shade under two hours with bonus tracks, Space Ritual is relentless in its sci-fi metaphor and unflinching in its execution. As one thrilling riff gives way to another – with disembodied voices echoing from the stage – the primitive music induces trance-like pleasure while electronic whooshes create the feeling of unstoppable flight. Brock, Lemmy and King, a rhythm section with not an ounce of virtuosity between them, pilot the vessel like crazed joyriders. It sometimes sounds like Krautrock made by Brits. (Hawkwind, indeed, had links to Neu! and Amon Düül II.) There’s none of that quintessentially English approach to space travel that we find in The Moody Blues or the 1968–9 Floyd. Space Ritual informs us that we’re flying at bewildering speed with no realistic chance of returning home, tells us not to panic, tells us we’re going to die, and takes us on a juddering journey into the psychedelic unknown. As a Hawkwind song title would put it in 1977, we like to be frightened. An intergalactic proto-punk synth-boogie odyssey, Space Ritual is an album that relies on repetition, oscillation, gradual dropdown, accelerated build-up and sudden attack. That line-up of Hawkwind knew how to do a number of simple things well – with sensory overload its number one objective – and they could repeat the same chords for eight or nine minutes (“Born To Go”, “Space Is Deep”, “Orgone Accumulator”) until it was time to make a decision whether to play the song forever or let it shapeshift into something else. Dik Mik and Del Dettmar were brilliant at this, filling the auditorium with FX-saturated space-noise so that the performance could continue uninterrupted. The song would either mutate into a new riff or into a Calvert interlude, in which he ramped up the dread (“You will feel dizzy! You will feel the need to vomit!”) with the stentorian diction of Jeremy Brett delivering a nuclear warning. In a glorious passage that spanned side three of the original vinyl, the Canned Heat-style “Orgone Accumulator” (propelled by Lemmy’s bass chords) merges into “Upside Down” - a new Brock tune - then segues via Dik Mik and Dettmar into Calvert’s “10 Seconds Of Forever” and finally into a stunning “Brainstorm”. You can hear Space Ritual’s influence today on bands like Wooden Shjips and Endless Boogie. In Hawkwind’s 40-year flight log, it rightly remains a stageshow – and an album – of legend. David Cavanagh Q&A Nik Turner How did the Space Ritual come about?
 Robert Calvert wrote Silver Machine as part of the Space Ritual – and the success of that single enabled us to mount the Space Ritual. The concept was put together by Robert and (designer) Barney Bubbles: they incorporated the Pythagorean Music Of The Spheres, into the design of the stage, the colours, and how the equipment was painted up. It was a monstrous project, a labour of love. Could these shows be a bit hit and miss?
 I think so. We did about 28 shows and I think it’s quite likely it was quite up and down. Calvert was there and not there, because he was a manic depressive. Sometimes he was there and full of energy. Sometimes he was in a loony bin. Was there camaraderie at this stage?
 The camaraderie only dissipated with the success. I even got on with Dave Brock at that time. I never aspired to success for Hawkwind, I just thought it was a wonderful thing playing in a band that turned people on and made people happy. INTERVIEW: JOHN ROBINSON

The psychedelic warlords’ live masterpiece reissued…

A recent Notes & Queries in The Guardian asked if any band had lasted as long as Hawkwind while having such little success. Hawkwind fans will have spotted the flaw in the question. Because of course there are no sales graphs or probability equations in space; merely spiral galaxies, golden voids and apocalyptic warnings. “Do not panic… small babies may be placed inside special cocoons and should be left if possible in shelters.” For Hawkwind, ‘success’ was getting the drugs over the border.

All the same, there have been important years in Hawkwind’s history, and 1972 was one of them. “Silver Machine” was an unexpected monster hit that summer, and a strong studio album (Doremi Fasol Latido) followed in November. To promote it, Hawkwind unveiled a new live act that combined hypnotic space-rock with a Liquid Len lightshow, a sci-fi storyline and a trio of interpretive dancers, including the towering, topless Stacia. Hawkwind’s line-up – possibly their best ever – comprised Nik Turner (wah-wah sax and flute), Dave Brock (guitar, vocals), Lemmy (bass, vocals), the duo of Dik Mik and Del Dettmar (synthesisers and electronics), thunder-drummer Simon King and the remarkable Robert Calvert, whose chilling announcements were crucial to maintaining a red-alert atmosphere. “Do not panic,” he urged, like a cosmic Corporal Jones. “You have only a few seconds to escape. Use those seconds sensibly or you will inevitably die.” God help anyone who saw the show on bad acid.

The double live album Space Ritual, which celebrates its 40th anniversary this year, was recorded at Liverpool Stadium and the Brixton Sundown in December 1972. Lasting a shade under two hours with bonus tracks, Space Ritual is relentless in its sci-fi metaphor and unflinching in its execution. As one thrilling riff gives way to another – with disembodied voices echoing from the stage – the primitive music induces trance-like pleasure while electronic whooshes create the feeling of unstoppable flight. Brock, Lemmy and King, a rhythm section with not an ounce of virtuosity between them, pilot the vessel like crazed joyriders. It sometimes sounds like Krautrock made by Brits. (Hawkwind, indeed, had links to Neu! and Amon Düül II.) There’s none of that quintessentially English approach to space travel that we find in The Moody Blues or the 1968–9 Floyd. Space Ritual informs us that we’re flying at bewildering speed with no realistic chance of returning home, tells us not to panic, tells us we’re going to die, and takes us on a juddering journey into the psychedelic unknown. As a Hawkwind song title would put it in 1977, we like to be frightened.

An intergalactic proto-punk synth-boogie odyssey, Space Ritual is an album that relies on repetition, oscillation, gradual dropdown, accelerated build-up and sudden attack. That line-up of Hawkwind knew how to do a number of simple things well – with sensory overload its number one objective – and they could repeat the same chords for eight or nine minutes (“Born To Go”, “Space Is Deep”, “Orgone Accumulator”) until it was time to make a decision whether to play the song forever or let it shapeshift into something else. Dik Mik and Del Dettmar were brilliant at this, filling the auditorium with FX-saturated space-noise so that the performance could continue uninterrupted. The song would either mutate into a new riff or into a Calvert interlude, in which he ramped up the dread (“You will feel dizzy! You will feel the need to vomit!”) with the stentorian diction of Jeremy Brett delivering a nuclear warning. In a glorious passage that spanned side three of the original vinyl, the Canned Heat-style “Orgone Accumulator” (propelled by Lemmy’s bass chords) merges into “Upside Down” – a new Brock tune – then segues via Dik Mik and Dettmar into Calvert’s “10 Seconds Of Forever” and finally into a stunning “Brainstorm”.

You can hear Space Ritual’s influence today on bands like Wooden Shjips and Endless Boogie. In Hawkwind’s 40-year flight log, it rightly remains a stageshow – and an album – of legend.

David Cavanagh

Q&A

Nik Turner

How did the Space Ritual come about?


Robert Calvert wrote Silver Machine as part of the Space Ritual – and the success of that single enabled us to mount the Space Ritual. The concept was put together by Robert and (designer) Barney Bubbles: they incorporated the Pythagorean Music Of The Spheres, into the design of the stage, the colours, and how the equipment was painted up. It was a monstrous project, a labour of love.

Could these shows be a bit hit and miss?


I think so. We did about 28 shows and I think it’s quite likely it was quite up and down. Calvert was there and not there, because he was a manic depressive. Sometimes he was there and full of energy. Sometimes he was in a loony bin.

Was there camaraderie at this stage?


The camaraderie only dissipated with the success. I even got on with Dave Brock at that time. I never aspired to success for Hawkwind, I just thought it was a wonderful thing playing in a band that turned people on and made people happy.

INTERVIEW: JOHN ROBINSON

“I met Andy Warhol at Madonna and Sean Penn’s wedding”: An interview with Crispin Glover

Catching a relatively straightfoward performance from Crispin Glover in Tim Burton's Alice In Wonderland over the festive season reminded me to dust down this interview I did with the actor for Uncut back in 2005. It was around the time of his directorial debut, What Is It?, a predictably strange and unsettling film that I'd seen earlier that year at the Sundance Film Festival. If I remember correctly, tracking Glover down for an interview proved a mildly tricky process. What Is It? was without a distributor, so I approached Glover via his website. I vaguely remembering entering into postal correspondence with someone who might have been his mother before the interview itself got scheduled. Anyway, here's the piece in full... There comes a moment, about half way through his interview with Uncut, when Crispin Glover announces in that thin, unsettling voice of his: "You know, I tend toward playing more extreme or eccentric characters." For the last 27 years, Crispin Glover has been an intense and edgy presence in movies you could variously describe as bizarre, disturbing or downright transgressive. Rake thin, pale to the point of translucency, with jet-black hair and piercing, dark eyes, he claims to be inspired by "the aesthetic of discomfort". The proof's there in his most eccentric performances - as Olivia Newton-John impersonator Larry in the rarely-seen The Orkly Kid (1985), speed-freak Lane in River's Edge (1986) - demonstrably further out there even than co-star Dennis Hopper - and cockroach-loving cousin Dell in David Lynch's Wild At Heart (1990). There's more, of course. He played one of Sean Penn's gang of teen hooligans in At Close Range (1985), was a memorably spaced out Warhol for Oliver Stone in The Doors (1991), and gently sent up his own persona as the sinister Thin Man in the two Charlie's Angels movies (2000; 2002). He's cameo'd for Milos Foreman (People Vs Larry Flint, 1986), Gus Van Sant (Even Cowgirls Get The Blues, 1993) and Jim Jarmusch (Dead Man, 1995). The wider world, though, might remember him for a July, 1987 appearance on Late Night With David Letterman, dressed in stack heels and wig, when he delivered a roundhouse kick to Letterman's head, stopping the show. His biggest commercial success came as George McFly, the father of Michael J Fox's Marty, in the Spielberg-produced Back To The Future (1985). But after refusing to sign up for the sequel, the producer's used his likeness without permission; he sued and won. The case prompted the Screen Actors Guild to devise new regulations about the use of actors' images. Born on April 20, 1964, he's the son of actor Bruce Glover, best known as Bond villain Mr Wynt, one of a pair of misanthropic gay hit men in Diamonds Are Forever. As Crispin Hellion Glover, he's published four books, cut ups of Victorian novels, overlaid with his own narrative additions and gruesome sketches, released through his Volcanic Eruptions imprint, and in 1989 he released an album, The Big Problem Does Not Equal The Solution, The Solution Equals Let It Be, a mostly spoken word affair, on which he covered Nancy Sinatra and Charles Manson. And now he's directed his first movie, What Is It?, which premiered at this year's Sundance Film Festival, and screened in Cannes last month. Apart from Glover, the cast consists almost entirely of performers with Down's Syndrome. One actor, dressed as a black and white minstrel, shoots slug juice into his face, declaring: "400 more injections and I shall be an invertebrate." There are talking snails and semi-naked women with animal heads. It's a provocative, uncomfortable piece of surrealism which Glover clearly views as being in the tradition of Bunuel, Dali, Jodorowsky and early Lynch. "What I always like has been the truly counter-cultural," he tells Uncut. "I'm only interested in people who live outside the mainstream." UNCUT: So, Crispin. What Is It? What *is* it? GLOVER: It's the adventures of a young man whose principle interests are snails, salt, a pipe and how to get home. As tormented by an hubristic, racist inner psyche. That's quite some pitch. What kind of questions are you asking with the film? I think the most important thing it does is question the lack of counter-culturism in the culture. By "counter-culture", I'm not referring to the counter-culture that existed in the 1960s and Seventies. There are different things to react to right now, and I don't see that going on in any kind of movement - maybe here and there in art, but I see very specific things that should be reacted to and that's what this film is about. Can you tell us something about the history of the movie? I've been working on this for nine and a half years. What Is It? was originally a short film to promote the concept of using people with Downs Syndrome. I was originally going to look at getting a film made with corporate funding, it had various actors attached, David Lynch was going to be executive producer, but the corporate entity had questions about the viability of shooting a movie using a cast of almost exclusively actors with Downs Syndrome. In fact, there's now going to be a trilogy of movies. The second one, I've already shot and I've just started editing that. I had to shoot the second one because the main actor in it, he was having some health issues, and I had to shoot it before he died. Why did you decide to use Downs Syndrome actors? When you look at somebody who has Downs Syndrome, there's a history in that person's face that means a lot of different things to different people. It's very apparent that these are people who have lived a life apart from the mainstream culture, which reinforces the film's identity. You could say that generally the characters you play in movies live outside the mainstream. I tend towards liking that stuff. I've always wanted there to be a counter-cultural movement, and the entire time I've been acting there hasn't really been one, which has been very frustrating for me. I end up playing characters that have an outsider element to them, because they're genuinely interesting to me. They're almost avant-garde. You went into acting very early on. You made your professional debut at 12, didn't you? I knew it was something I could do. It was a business concept in my mind. I knew that I couldn't just have my parents support me. My father was an actor and my mother was a dancer and actress, so I was familiar with the basic understanding of how the business worked and I knew I had an ability to do it. Who were your role models? I assume your father... No, no. I wouldn't say my father was a role model. I didn't think, "Oh, I can be like my father", no. I had interests in certain things right from a young age like surrealism and certain kinds of graphic art, but I didn't necessarily equate them with film or acting. At that point, acting was more something I could do - if I was going to be in a television commercial, that would be great. Then I did television, and eventually, when I was 18, I started making movies, and then at a certain point I just wanted to do a certain kind of film. Let's talk about The Orkly Kid, one of your personal favourites. It marks the start of your relationship with Sean Penn. It hasn't been seen very much, but I think people can find it on the Internet. It's only 35 minutes long. It's been put into a trilogy of movies called the Beaver Trilogy. That's one of the reasons I like it so much because I got to watch the actual person it was based on. It was an American Film Institute project, Sean did the first year film and he was supposed to do the second year version but things were getting really busy for him and he recommended me for the part. He was very nice to me early in my career. I worked with him on At Close Range and Racing With The Moon. He helped get me some of the jobs, so it was good. Your breakthrough role was in Back To The Future, where you sued the producers. How do you look back on that experience? I have difficulty with the film itself, but on top of that I had a very difficult experience with the producers and the filmmakers where I had to get into a lawsuit. They made another actor up to look like me specifically, as opposed to the character, and then they inter-spliced some footage of me from the original film to fool people into believing that it was me. I've never seen the film since; it's not a pleasant memory. River's Edge is a great movie, a fantastic performance. Where does Lane come from? He's pretty unhinged. Yes, I think so too. There are different reasons for liking different performances and that is definitely one of my best performances. The original script was based on a real event in Oregon. I always felt it was quite realistic. The issue dealing with the covering up of death and that kind of stuff, that I thought was accurate. The films I like best that I'm in are The Orky Kid and River's Edge. For the most part, an acting career is a business. You have to keep working in order to survive, so you can't always count on being in excellent films. I wish I could, but really the only films that I think are genuinely excellent all the way through are those two. Walken in At Close Range and Hopper in River's Edge. Are these actors you feel an affinity with? My father knows Christopher Walken very well, they worked together in New York as actors, I believe. And I do like Easy Rider and The Last Movie. Of course, I have a whole different background and there's different things I'm interested in. But I understand what you're talking about, how people perceive me, and how you could connect us to a certain type of character we've all played. But it's not something I grew up thinking - I want to be like these people. Let's talk about that Letterman appearance. Some sources suggest you were on acid at the time; others say it was a piece of performance art. Care to set the record straight? That appearance definitely had a large impact in the United States. For many years, people have considered me insane, or crazy... But they think that really is Crispin Glover, and they should understand there1s a difference between who I am in my day-to-day life and the characters I've played. I have never personally stated what it was, for various reasons. Primarily to let it be what it is and to let people figure out for themselves what it is. Back to the movies. Wild At Heart. I take it you were a fan of David Lynch? Definitely. I saw Eraserhead repeatedly when I was 16. That's my favourite David Lynch film, it was an extremely important artistic influence on me. It was very interesting working with him on Wild At Heart because I was in acting class at the time and I would take things that I had seen in that film and utilise them in class. I learned to act through an improvisational techniques class that used Michael Checkov and Ute Hagen techniques. When I worked with David, I could see the story not necessarily as complicated or mysterious as it seemed, but just very straightforward psychologically. That's another performance of mine that I really do like a lot. Cousin Dell's completely mad, Crispin. He wears a Santa suit, he's convinced aliens are coming for him, and he puts cockroaches down his pants... Yes, I'm happy with how it came out. OK, then there's Warhol in The Doors... I met Andy Warhol at Madonna and Sean Penn's wedding. It was just after Back To The Future had been released and he was very complimentary about my performance to me. But I stood back and watched him after we1d talked, watched his movements, how he was. He was a very interesting person, very quiet but very intense. Then it wasn't too long after that that I knew there was a small role of Warhol in The Doors movie. I had met Oliver Stone for Platoon, and although I had gotten on with him, I wasn't right for it. But then I pursued that Warhol role. Andy Warhol was a difficult one, though, because he's not quite on your mind - he's more of an image that you think of, like in photographs. It's not like playing Marlon Brando or James Dean, or people that are personality types. I had a prosthetic nose in the film, but being that I'd met him I did try to replicate the essence of Andy Warhol. As for Charlie's Angels, there's something quite subversive about seeing you co-starring with Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore in a big budget studio film. I understand that, but on some levels, I don't feel like it is subversive because I grew up in the film industry and my father1s an actor. Most of the work I've done, it really has been coming from mainstream Hollywood filmmaking. And also, in order to fund my own films, I had to make as much money as I could in the pro cultural film state that exists. I don't have a bad attitude to it, I want to do the best job I can and find the most interesting things I can in the characters. Outside of movies, can we talk about the books. There's four of them... ... in fact, I've made many of them that I've not published. I'd like to publish more of them but my finances are all tied up in the films right now. There's almost 20 of them. Each of them are different. The earlier ones tended toward utilising a lot of the text that was in an original book from the 1880s and I'd rework it, and then I'd put images in and I'd rework the images. Some of the other books, though, I would only use the binding of the book and then I would completely obliterate the text and come up with different images and text. I'm proud of the books, but that artistic energy has gone into making films - or making What Is It? in particular. I hear you collect antique medical equipment. That's not entirely accurate. In an article, a journalist wrote that I collected antique medical equipment and I had a collection of diseased eyeballs. It's not true - I mean, I do know people that have collections of certain kinds of things. I see a beauty to some of those things but it's not something I collect. I do have a stainless steel medical table that I've had almost 20 years now. It used to be that my apartment was painted black and I had very little furniture in the living room - it was almost more like an art display and I had this stainless steel medical table there. I also have one case of wax replications that was from the 1800s. I bought it in England, it's museum quality. I also have a lot of antique furniture. I tend toward liking older things. But none of its medical. To order Crispin's books and album, visit www.crispinglover.com

Catching a relatively straightfoward performance from Crispin Glover in Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland over the festive season reminded me to dust down this interview I did with the actor for Uncut back in 2005.

It was around the time of his directorial debut, What Is It?, a predictably strange and unsettling film that I’d seen earlier that year at the Sundance Film Festival. If I remember correctly, tracking Glover down for an interview proved a mildly tricky process. What Is It? was without a distributor, so I approached Glover via his website. I vaguely remembering entering into postal correspondence with someone who might have been his mother before the interview itself got scheduled. Anyway, here’s the piece in full…

There comes a moment, about half way through his interview with Uncut, when Crispin Glover announces in that thin, unsettling voice of his: “You know, I tend toward playing more extreme or eccentric characters.”

For the last 27 years, Crispin Glover has been an intense and edgy presence in movies you could variously describe as bizarre, disturbing or downright transgressive. Rake thin, pale to the point of translucency, with jet-black hair and piercing, dark eyes, he claims to be inspired by “the aesthetic of discomfort”. The proof’s there in his most eccentric performances – as Olivia Newton-John impersonator Larry in the rarely-seen The Orkly Kid (1985), speed-freak Lane in River’s Edge (1986) – demonstrably further out there even than co-star Dennis Hopper – and cockroach-loving cousin Dell in David Lynch’s Wild At Heart (1990).

There’s more, of course. He played one of Sean Penn’s gang of teen hooligans in At Close Range (1985), was a memorably spaced out Warhol for Oliver Stone in The Doors (1991), and gently sent up his own persona as the sinister Thin Man in the two Charlie’s Angels movies (2000; 2002). He’s cameo’d for Milos Foreman (People Vs Larry Flint, 1986), Gus Van Sant (Even Cowgirls Get The Blues, 1993) and Jim Jarmusch (Dead Man, 1995).

The wider world, though, might remember him for a July, 1987 appearance on Late Night With David Letterman, dressed in stack heels and wig, when he delivered a roundhouse kick to Letterman’s head, stopping the show. His biggest commercial success came as George McFly, the father of Michael J Fox’s Marty, in the Spielberg-produced Back To The Future (1985). But after refusing to sign up for the sequel, the producer’s used his likeness without permission; he sued and won. The case prompted the Screen Actors Guild to devise new regulations about the use of actors’ images.

Born on April 20, 1964, he’s the son of actor Bruce Glover, best known as Bond villain Mr Wynt, one of a pair of misanthropic gay hit men in Diamonds Are Forever. As Crispin Hellion Glover, he’s published four books, cut ups of Victorian novels, overlaid with his own narrative additions and gruesome sketches, released through his Volcanic Eruptions imprint, and in 1989 he released an album, The Big Problem Does Not Equal The Solution, The Solution Equals Let It Be, a mostly spoken word affair, on which he covered Nancy Sinatra and Charles Manson.

And now he’s directed his first movie, What Is It?, which premiered at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, and screened in Cannes last month. Apart from Glover, the cast consists almost entirely of performers with Down’s Syndrome. One actor, dressed as a black and white minstrel, shoots slug juice into his face, declaring: “400 more injections and I shall be an invertebrate.” There are talking snails and semi-naked women with animal heads. It’s a provocative, uncomfortable piece of surrealism which Glover clearly views as being in the tradition of Bunuel, Dali, Jodorowsky and early Lynch. “What I always like has been the truly counter-cultural,” he tells Uncut. “I’m only interested in people who live outside the mainstream.”

UNCUT: So, Crispin. What Is It? What *is* it?

GLOVER: It’s the adventures of a young man whose principle interests are snails, salt, a pipe and how to get home. As tormented by an hubristic, racist inner psyche.

That’s quite some pitch. What kind of questions are you asking with the film?

I think the most important thing it does is question the lack of counter-culturism in the culture. By “counter-culture”, I’m not referring to the counter-culture that existed in the 1960s and Seventies. There are different things to react to right now, and I don’t see that going on in any kind of movement – maybe here and there in art, but I see very specific things that should be reacted to and that’s what this film is about.

Can you tell us something about the history of the movie?

I’ve been working on this for nine and a half years. What Is It? was originally a short film to promote the concept of using people with Downs Syndrome. I was originally going to look at getting a film made with corporate funding, it had various actors attached, David Lynch was going to be executive producer, but the corporate entity had questions about the viability of shooting a movie using a cast of almost exclusively actors with Downs Syndrome. In fact, there’s now going to be a trilogy of movies. The second one, I’ve already shot and I’ve just started editing that. I had to shoot the second one because the main actor in it, he was having some health issues, and I had to shoot it before he died.

Why did you decide to use Downs Syndrome actors?

When you look at somebody who has Downs Syndrome, there’s a history in that person’s face that means a lot of different things to different people. It’s very apparent that these are people who have lived a life apart from the mainstream culture, which reinforces the film’s identity.

You could say that generally the characters you play in movies live outside the mainstream.

I tend towards liking that stuff. I’ve always wanted there to be a counter-cultural movement, and the entire time I’ve been acting there hasn’t really been one, which has been very frustrating for me. I end up playing characters that have an outsider element to them, because they’re genuinely interesting to me. They’re almost avant-garde.

You went into acting very early on. You made your professional debut at 12, didn’t you?

I knew it was something I could do. It was a business concept in my mind. I knew that I couldn’t just have my parents support me. My father was an actor and my mother was a dancer and actress, so I was familiar with the basic understanding of how the business worked and I knew I had an ability to do it.

Who were your role models? I assume your father…

No, no. I wouldn’t say my father was a role model. I didn’t think, “Oh, I can be like my father”, no. I had interests in certain things right from a young age like surrealism and certain kinds of graphic art, but I didn’t necessarily equate them with film or acting. At that point, acting was more something I could do – if I was going to be in a television commercial, that would be great. Then I did television, and eventually, when I was 18, I started making movies, and then at a certain point I just wanted to do a certain kind of film.

Let’s talk about The Orkly Kid, one of your personal favourites. It marks the start of your relationship with Sean Penn.

It hasn’t been seen very much, but I think people can find it on the Internet. It’s only 35 minutes long. It’s been put into a trilogy of movies called the Beaver Trilogy. That’s one of the reasons I like it so much because I got to watch the actual person it was based on. It was an American Film Institute project, Sean did the first year film and he was supposed to do the second year version but things were getting really busy for him and he recommended me for the part. He was very nice to me early in my career. I worked with him on At Close Range and Racing With The Moon. He helped get me some of the jobs, so it was good.

Your breakthrough role was in Back To The Future, where you sued the producers. How do you look back on that experience?

I have difficulty with the film itself, but on top of that I had a very difficult experience with the producers and the filmmakers where I had to get into a lawsuit. They made another actor up to look like me specifically, as opposed to the character, and then they inter-spliced some footage of me from the original film to fool people into believing that it was me. I’ve never seen the film since; it’s not a pleasant memory.

River’s Edge is a great movie, a fantastic performance. Where does Lane come from? He’s pretty unhinged.

Yes, I think so too. There are different reasons for liking different performances and that is definitely one of my best performances. The original script was based on a real event in Oregon. I always felt it was quite realistic. The issue dealing with the covering up of death and that kind of stuff, that I thought was accurate. The films I like best that I’m in are The Orky Kid and River’s Edge. For the most part, an acting career is a business. You have to keep working in order to survive, so you can’t always count on being in excellent films. I wish I could, but really the only films that I think are genuinely excellent all the way through are those two.

Walken in At Close Range and Hopper in River’s Edge. Are these actors you feel an affinity with?

My father knows Christopher Walken very well, they worked together in New York as actors, I believe. And I do like Easy Rider and The Last Movie. Of course, I have a whole different background and there’s different things I’m interested in. But I understand what you’re talking about, how people perceive me, and how you could connect us to a certain type of character we’ve all played. But it’s not something I grew up thinking – I want to be like these people.

Let’s talk about that Letterman appearance. Some sources suggest you were on acid at the time; others say it was a piece of performance art. Care to set the record straight?

That appearance definitely had a large impact in the United States. For many years, people have considered me insane, or crazy… But they think that really is Crispin Glover, and they should understand there1s a difference between who I am in my day-to-day life and the characters I’ve played. I have never personally stated what it was, for various reasons. Primarily to let it be what it is and to let people figure out for themselves what it is.

Back to the movies. Wild At Heart. I take it you were a fan of David Lynch?

Definitely. I saw Eraserhead repeatedly when I was 16. That’s my favourite David Lynch film, it was an extremely important artistic influence on me. It was very interesting working with him on Wild At Heart because I was in acting class at the time and I would take things that I had seen in that film and utilise them in class. I learned to act through an improvisational techniques class that used Michael Checkov and Ute Hagen techniques. When I worked with David, I could see the story not necessarily as complicated or mysterious as it seemed, but just very straightforward psychologically. That’s another performance of mine that I really do like a lot.

Cousin Dell’s completely mad, Crispin. He wears a Santa suit, he’s convinced aliens are coming for him, and he puts cockroaches down his pants…

Yes, I’m happy with how it came out.

OK, then there’s Warhol in The Doors…

I met Andy Warhol at Madonna and Sean Penn’s wedding. It was just after Back To The Future had been released and he was very complimentary about my performance to me. But I stood back and watched him after we1d talked, watched his movements, how he was. He was a very interesting person, very quiet but very intense. Then it wasn’t too long after that that I knew there was a small role of Warhol in The Doors movie. I had met Oliver Stone for Platoon, and although I had gotten on with him, I wasn’t right for it. But then I pursued that Warhol role. Andy Warhol was a difficult one, though, because he’s not quite on your mind – he’s more of an image that you think of, like in photographs. It’s not like playing Marlon Brando or James Dean, or people that are personality types. I had a prosthetic nose in the film, but being that I’d met him I did try to replicate the essence of Andy Warhol.

As for Charlie’s Angels, there’s something quite subversive about seeing you co-starring with Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore in a big budget studio film.

I understand that, but on some levels, I don’t feel like it is subversive because I grew up in the film industry and my father1s an actor. Most of the work I’ve done, it really has been coming from mainstream Hollywood filmmaking. And also, in order to fund my own films, I had to make as much money as I could in the pro cultural film state that exists. I don’t have a bad attitude to it, I want to do the best job I can and find the most interesting things I can in the characters.

Outside of movies, can we talk about the books. There’s four of them…

… in fact, I’ve made many of them that I’ve not published. I’d like to publish more of them but my finances are all tied up in the films right now. There’s almost 20 of them. Each of them are different. The earlier ones tended toward utilising a lot of the text that was in an original book from the 1880s and I’d rework it, and then I’d put images in and I’d rework the images. Some of the other books, though, I would only use the binding of the book and then I would completely obliterate the text and come up with different images and text. I’m proud of the books, but that artistic energy has gone into making films – or making What Is It? in particular.

I hear you collect antique medical equipment.

That’s not entirely accurate. In an article, a journalist wrote that I collected antique medical equipment and I had a collection of diseased eyeballs. It’s not true – I mean, I do know people that have collections of certain kinds of things. I see a beauty to some of those things but it’s not something I collect. I do have a stainless steel medical table that I’ve had almost 20 years now. It used to be that my apartment was painted black and I had very little furniture in the living room – it was almost more like an art display and I had this stainless steel medical table there. I also have one case of wax replications that was from the 1800s. I bought it in England, it’s museum quality. I also have a lot of antique furniture. I tend toward liking older things. But none of its medical.

To order Crispin’s books and album, visit www.crispinglover.com

The First Uncut Playlist Of 2013

0

Happy new year, everybody. Bit of a tentative start to 2013, though the new issue with Gram Parsons on the cover has just arrived in UK shops. A plug, too, for the next Uncut Ultimate Music Guide, dedicated to The Beatles, which I think is out January 17. Post has been sketchy these past three days, which may account for the slight weirdness of this list. Still, renewed-for-2013 love for Endless Boogie, Purling Hiss and Parquet Courts, and a fine new Angel Olsen song/vid to watch. Playing the Horrors remix album as I type, and can definitely recommend the Blanck Mass take on “I Can See Through You”. Looking forward to the Chris Watson remix when that one comes up… Oh, and the Jim O’Rourke album is in this week’s list because my iTunes rolled onto it once the Jim James album finished. Sounded so great, though, that I couldn’t resist embedding the whole thing here. Please have a listen if you’ve never encountered it before. Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnRMulvey 1 Julia Kent – Character (Leaf) 2 Howlin Rain – The Griffin, San Diego CA 10/11/12 (Silver Current) 3 The Men – New Moon (Sacred Bones) 4 Annette Peacock – I’m The One (RCA) 5 The Family Cat – Five Lives Left: The Anthology (3 Loop Music) 6 John Grant – Pale Green Ghosts (Bella Union) 7 Parquet Courts – Light Up Gold (http://dulltools.bandcamp.com/album/light-up-gold) 8 Sun Araw, M. Geddes Gengras And The Raw Power Band Meet The Congos – Icon Give Life (http://rvng.bandcamp.com/album/icon-give-life) 9 Mazes – Ores And Minerals (FatCat) 10 Endless Boogie – Long Island (No Quarter) 11 Angel Olsen – Sweet Dreams (Sixteen Tambourines) 12 Purling Hiss – Water On Mars (Drag City) 13 Jim James - Regions Of Light And Sound Of God (V2) 14 Jim O’Rourke – The Visitor (Drag City) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c2ZgVKTmTI 15 The Horrors – Higher (XL)

Happy new year, everybody. Bit of a tentative start to 2013, though the new issue with Gram Parsons on the cover has just arrived in UK shops. A plug, too, for the next Uncut Ultimate Music Guide, dedicated to The Beatles, which I think is out January 17.

Post has been sketchy these past three days, which may account for the slight weirdness of this list. Still, renewed-for-2013 love for Endless Boogie, Purling Hiss and Parquet Courts, and a fine new Angel Olsen song/vid to watch. Playing the Horrors remix album as I type, and can definitely recommend the Blanck Mass take on “I Can See Through You”. Looking forward to the Chris Watson remix when that one comes up…

Oh, and the Jim O’Rourke album is in this week’s list because my iTunes rolled onto it once the Jim James album finished. Sounded so great, though, that I couldn’t resist embedding the whole thing here. Please have a listen if you’ve never encountered it before.

Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnRMulvey

1 Julia Kent – Character (Leaf)

2 Howlin Rain – The Griffin, San Diego CA 10/11/12 (Silver Current)

3 The Men – New Moon (Sacred Bones)

4 Annette Peacock – I’m The One (RCA)

5 The Family Cat – Five Lives Left: The Anthology (3 Loop Music)

6 John Grant – Pale Green Ghosts (Bella Union)

7 Parquet Courts – Light Up Gold (http://dulltools.bandcamp.com/album/light-up-gold)

8 Sun Araw, M. Geddes Gengras And The Raw Power Band Meet The Congos – Icon Give Life (http://rvng.bandcamp.com/album/icon-give-life)

9 Mazes – Ores And Minerals (FatCat)

10 Endless Boogie – Long Island (No Quarter)

11 Angel Olsen – Sweet Dreams (Sixteen Tambourines)

12 Purling Hiss – Water On Mars (Drag City)

13 Jim James – Regions Of Light And Sound Of God (V2)

14 Jim O’Rourke – The Visitor (Drag City)

15 The Horrors – Higher (XL)

Bobby Womack updates fans on battle with Alzheimer’s

0
Bobby Womack has released an official statement after revealing this week that he is suffering from Alzheimer’s. The 68-year-old, who released his first single in 1954, previously admitted he is suffering from the brain disorder and that he struggles to recall the names of his songs and those of...

Bobby Womack has released an official statement after revealing this week that he is suffering from Alzheimer’s.

The 68-year-old, who released his first single in 1954, previously admitted he is suffering from the brain disorder and that he struggles to recall the names of his songs and those of his collaborators.

He said: “The doctor says there are signs of Alzheimer’s. It’s not bad yet but will get worse. How can I not remember songs I wrote? It’s frustrating. I don’t feel together yet. Negative things come in my mind and it’s hard for me to remember sometimes.”

Now Womack has updated fans through an official statement, which reads: “Thanks to all of my fans for their prayers and well wishes. I truly appreciate and can feel your love. With the support of many good doctors, my family, and all of my wonderful fans, I will continue to write and perform and bring the good music to the people for as long as I can.”

Womack, who beat colon cancer in May, released his most-recent album The Bravest Man In The Universe in 2012, which was co-produced by Blur’s Damon Albarn and XL Recordings co-founder Richard Russell.

He added: “The most embarrassing thing is I’ll be ready to announce Damon and can’t remember his last name.”

This could be in reference to his appearance at an awards ceremony in September when he called Albarn ‘Damon Osbourne’ in his acceptance speech.

‘Crossfire Hurricane’ director reveals first details of Kurt Cobain film

0
Brett Morgen, who directed The Rolling Stones film Crossfire Hurricane, has given an outline of the Kurt Cobain film he's been working on for the past five years. Speaking to NME, Morgen said that just as the tone of Crossfire Hurricane had been dictated by its subject, the as-yet-untitled film ab...

Brett Morgen, who directed The Rolling Stones film Crossfire Hurricane, has given an outline of the Kurt Cobain film he’s been working on for the past five years.

Speaking to NME, Morgen said that just as the tone of Crossfire Hurricane had been dictated by its subject, the as-yet-untitled film about the Nirvana frontman would too be an embodiment of his character.

Morgen said: “If you think about Kurt, he’s a contradiction. He could be sincere and sentimental, and also ironic and sarcastic. He was sweet and sour. He was incredibly funny too, and the film has to reflect his sprit.

He added: “The thing about him people might not know too is that he was an incredible visual artist and left behind a treasure chest of comic books, paintings, Super8 films, all sorts. We’re hoping the Cobain film, that’ll hopefully be released in 2014, will be this generation’s The Wall – a mix of animation and live action that’ll allow the audience to experience Kurt in a way they never have before. It’s very ambitious.”

He went on to explain it was Courtney Love and Cobain’s estate that had brought him in to work on the film, and after years of planning and development, it’s recently come together.

Crossfire Hurricane, Morgen’s film about the Rolling Stones from formation up until 1981, was recently shown in selected cinemas to mark the band’s 50th anniversary. It was also broadcast on the BBC, and is released on DVD on Monday, January 7.

The Heartbreakers – L.A.M.F: Definitive Edition

0

Here’s no mud in your ear! The Johnny Thunders gang’s epochal 1977 album restored (yet again), with demos, alternative mixes... and badges! Veterans of this campaign may well raise a weary eyebrow over that “definitive” claim. That L.A.M.F., the only album by Johnny Thunders’s swaggering, smacked-up post-New York Dolls outfit, The Heartbreakers, is one of New York punk’s defining artifacts (despite being recorded in Britain) is beyond dispute: twelve songs that put the guitarist’s abiding passions – Chuck Berry, the Stones, Phil Spector and Shadow Morton girl groups, glam, garage, trash and junk – in perfect, speedy collision. What’s equally undeniable, though, is that it has been victim to one of the most tortuous release histories in popular music. Feverishly anticipated, L.A.M.F. – inspired by graffiti New York gangs used to tag their turf, it stands, of course, for “Like A Motherfucker” - was met with widespread dismay in 1977, due to a mysterious sound fault that notoriously submerged the band’s switchblade style deep in murk. Attempts to rectify the sonic situation have been ongoing ever since, with the result the album has now been issued and reissued in a plethora of differently “restored” iterations. But trying to get back to the record the band intended has proven a thorny business. The first sleazoid supergroup of New York’s downtown scene, The Heartbreakers formed in April 1975, when Thunders and drummer Jerry Nolan acrimoniously quit The Dolls and hooked up with Richard Hell, who had left Television in similarly bitter circumstances the same week, and was developing a similarly heavy heroin habit. Recruiting louche and looming guitarist Walter Lure, the original Heartbreakers fused Hell’s wired poetic concerns with a simpler, rawer rock sound, led by Thunders’ swashbuckling guitar, but the volatile combination of ego and addiction saw Hell quitting after a year, replaced on bass by sometime gigolo Billy Rath. A more straightforwardly rock’n’roll proposition, Heartbreakers Mk II built a ferocious live reputation on the CBGBs circuit, but also had another reputation – for drugs, bad news and trouble – that meant no American record label would touch them. So when one-time Dolls manager Malcolm McLaren invited them to the UK to join the Sex Pistols’ Anarchy Tour, they were ready to try their luck in pastures new. Luck, though, was something the Heartbreakers never really had. Arriving just as Grundygate outraged the nation’s tabloids, they found the tour disintegrating as sixteen of nineteen gigs were cancelled, leaving the band stranded without wages over the winter of 1976. A string of hastily arranged London shows built another fervent following, however, and attracted Track Records, The Who’s label, with who they finally signed early in ’77 – blissfully unaware that Track was in financial disarray. Despite some junkie monkey business, and Track’s debatable choice of Thunderclap Newman vocalist Speedy Keen as producer, recording sessions for *L.A.M.F* passed off relatively smoothly. It was only when the band heard pressings of “Chinese Rocks,” the my-life-under-smack anthem written by an eternally disputed combination of Dee Dee Ramone, Hell and Thunders, selected as the ideal lead single, that the trouble began. Deeply unhappy with how the record sounded, the group launched into a protracted period of remixing all the songs. With Nolan in particular growing obsessed the mix was to blame, but unable to pinpoint the problem, the Heartbreakers spent months tinkering in an increasingly frantic cabin fever atmosphere. Eventually, they amassed over 250 mixes. It might have gone on forever, but Track ordered the record released in October ’77, to the fury of Nolan, who quit. Ironically, much later, it emerged the mix was never the problem: it was a persistent mastering flaw, as the tapes were transferred to vinyl. Taking a lead from rumours leaking from the studio, reviewers zeroed in on the album’s sound problems: “[The Heartbreakers] are mutilated beyond all dignity,” frothed Julie Burchill in the NME, “[producers] Speedy Keen and Daniel Secunda deserve at the very least to have their ears cut off.” In Sounds, Jon Savage was less savage, but flung the word that stuck: “the songs… sound muddy.” Confirming suspicions that the Heartbreakers were too messed up and sloppy to deal with, the response to the album hastened their demise. But the idea of restoring L.A.M.F. to its intended glory became a punk holy grail. When Track went under in 1978, Heartbreakers manager Leee Black Childers broke into the offices to liberate the tapes. The masters were missing, but those 250-odd remixes remained. The first major reconstruction came in 1982, when Thunders reworked the tapes as L.A.M.F. Revisited, hailed as the definitive version. In 1994, three years after Thunders’s death, there came another complete overhaul with L.A.M.F: The Lost ’77 Mixes, hailed as… well, you get the idea. Personality crisis, indeed. Still preferred by many, Lost ’77 Mixes is included again here, but the centrepiece of this excellent 4-disc box is a carefully “de-muddied” new restoration of the original Track LP, created, in the absence of the masters, by running the 1977 vinyl through the latest mastering software. The results are, if not revelatory, at least deeply rewarding. This restoration doesn’t have the sheer (some might argue shrill) in-your-face attack of Lost ’77 Mixes, but L.A.M.F. is revealed to have a thicker, warmer sound that proves much easier to spend time with. The bad news for fans is, you need to hear this one. The worse news, though, is that L.A.M.F: Definitive Edition appears hot on the heels of *another* recent, highly significant, online restoration by the fans behind the whitetrashsoul blog, who discovered that various European pressings of the 1977 album were actually cut using different mixes again, and sound infinitely superior to the UK release. (I was sceptical, until I heard the aching “It’s Not Enough” unearthed from the French ’77 LP, and was gobsmacked by how its strumming bed of acoustic guitars chimed out like never before.) The painstaking whitetrashsoul compilation is worth investigating, and comparing against the other alternative mixes amassed for Disc 4 here. The danger is, you’ll be sucked into the endless maze of trying to assemble your own “ultimate” L.A.M.F from various sources. As you wade through several subtly different versions of “Baby Talk” trying to find The One, you may find your bleeding ears going cross-eyed, and sympathise with what The Heartbreakers endured. Still one thing remains unaltered throughout: this really is one motherfucker of an album. That’s definitive. EXTRAS: Alongside the restoration of the Track LP and The Lost ’77 Mixes, there’s a disc of early Heartbreakers demos, including four previously (officially) unreleased from the Richard Hell incarnation. The final disc offers more alternative mixes, including a “Born To Lose” that bizarrely buries Thunders’s guitar until it’s barely audible. There’s also a well-illustrated, 44-page booklet laying out the Heartbreakers’ saga, and four wee badges, to make you the envy of every punk in town. Damien Love Q&A WALTER LURE What’s your take on what happened with the sound? WL: Everybody blamed the mix. Jerry in particular. I didn’t think the mix was bad, because when we played it back in the studio, it sounded fine. For me it was something that had happened when it got transferred from tape to vinyl. It lost the edge, got this muffled sound. To me, that pointed to the mastering. But, anyway, the mix was being blamed. We tried everything. We went to various studios, Abbey Road, I don’t know how many mastering studios, and tried to redo it. And every time: it sounded great in the studio, but as soon as went onto vinyl, it sounded like it was underwater. Jerry kept insisting it was the mix, so they gave him a few weeks in the studio alone to work on it. And his stuff came out sounding worse than the original. By this point, it was October ‘77, and the record company said, “Listen: this has got to be released.” Because they were going to miss the Christmas rush, they’d lose sales, and we’d lose our contract. They’d spent a lot of money on it by then, with all this time, eight, nine months, in different studios, bouncing around trying to fix it. So, Johnny, Billy and me said, “Well, okay.” But Jerry said if it was going to come out like that, he was going to quit the band right there. And he did. And the record came out, and that was what we were stuck with. Leaving aside the sound problem, how was it recording? WL: Well, we knew the songs inside out, because we had been playing them live for two years. So that was no problem. Toward the end, the sessions got more and more wild, because Johnny and Jerry would show up five or six hours late, because they were running around London trying to find their next pile of abusive substances. It got a bit hectic, people showing up to find they’d missed the session by 12 hours, but nothing really bad. But it was getting to the point that, if we *had* done another record, it would have been complete madness, because Johnny was getting increasingly out of control. You were all sharing a house during that time, like some degenerate version of The Monkees… WL: When we first got over there, we were crashing around at Sebastian Conran’s parent’s house, that December around the Anarchy Tour. Then, once we got the record contract, we moved into Pimlico, and that’s where we lived during most of the recording. A small basement flat. Me and Jerry shared a room, Billy had a room, and Johnny had a room. It got pretty nutty. Up all night. All sorts of weird people popping in and out. There’d be dealers coming over, we’d let them crash, then people would be going through their clothes in the middle of the night, trying to find their stash. Nancy Spungen came over, because she’d gotten a guitar of Jerry’s out of the pawnshop – that’s the only reason he let her in the house. And twenty minutes after she showed up, he threw her out. That’s when she went on to meet Sid, and, well, another story happened. It wasn’t like *complete* mayhem. A couple of us OD’d from time to time, and the others would throw us into the bathtub to wake us up. But other than that, it was pretty run of the mill. INTERVIEW: DAMIEN LOVE

Here’s no mud in your ear! The Johnny Thunders gang’s epochal 1977 album restored (yet again), with demos, alternative mixes… and badges!

Veterans of this campaign may well raise a weary eyebrow over that “definitive” claim. That L.A.M.F., the only album by Johnny Thunders’s swaggering, smacked-up post-New York Dolls outfit, The Heartbreakers, is one of New York punk’s defining artifacts (despite being recorded in Britain) is beyond dispute: twelve songs that put the guitarist’s abiding passions – Chuck Berry, the Stones, Phil Spector and Shadow Morton girl groups, glam, garage, trash and junk – in perfect, speedy collision.

What’s equally undeniable, though, is that it has been victim to one of the most tortuous release histories in popular music. Feverishly anticipated, L.A.M.F. – inspired by graffiti New York gangs used to tag their turf, it stands, of course, for “Like A Motherfucker” – was met with widespread dismay in 1977, due to a mysterious sound fault that notoriously submerged the band’s switchblade style deep in murk.

Attempts to rectify the sonic situation have been ongoing ever since, with the result the album has now been issued and reissued in a plethora of differently “restored” iterations. But trying to get back to the record the band intended has proven a thorny business.

The first sleazoid supergroup of New York’s downtown scene, The Heartbreakers formed in April 1975, when Thunders and drummer Jerry Nolan acrimoniously quit The Dolls and hooked up with Richard Hell, who had left Television in similarly bitter circumstances the same week, and was developing a similarly heavy heroin habit. Recruiting louche and looming guitarist Walter Lure, the original Heartbreakers fused Hell’s wired poetic concerns with a simpler, rawer rock sound, led by Thunders’ swashbuckling guitar, but the volatile combination of ego and addiction saw Hell quitting after a year, replaced on bass by sometime gigolo Billy Rath.

A more straightforwardly rock’n’roll proposition, Heartbreakers Mk II built a ferocious live reputation on the CBGBs circuit, but also had another reputation – for drugs, bad news and trouble – that meant no American record label would touch them. So when one-time Dolls manager Malcolm McLaren invited them to the UK to join the Sex Pistols’ Anarchy Tour, they were ready to try their luck in pastures new.

Luck, though, was something the Heartbreakers never really had. Arriving just as Grundygate outraged the nation’s tabloids, they found the tour disintegrating as sixteen of nineteen gigs were cancelled, leaving the band stranded without wages over the winter of 1976. A string of hastily arranged London shows built another fervent following, however, and attracted Track Records, The Who’s label, with who they finally signed early in ’77 – blissfully unaware that Track was in financial disarray.

Despite some junkie monkey business, and Track’s debatable choice of Thunderclap Newman vocalist Speedy Keen as producer, recording sessions for *L.A.M.F* passed off relatively smoothly. It was only when the band heard pressings of “Chinese Rocks,” the my-life-under-smack anthem written by an eternally disputed combination of Dee Dee Ramone, Hell and Thunders, selected as the ideal lead single, that the trouble began.

Deeply unhappy with how the record sounded, the group launched into a protracted period of remixing all the songs. With Nolan in particular growing obsessed the mix was to blame, but unable to pinpoint the problem, the Heartbreakers spent months tinkering in an increasingly frantic cabin fever atmosphere. Eventually, they amassed over 250 mixes. It might have gone on forever, but Track ordered the record released in October ’77, to the fury of Nolan, who quit. Ironically, much later, it emerged the mix was never the problem: it was a persistent mastering flaw, as the tapes were transferred to vinyl.

Taking a lead from rumours leaking from the studio, reviewers zeroed in on the album’s sound problems: “[The Heartbreakers] are mutilated beyond all dignity,” frothed Julie Burchill in the NME, “[producers] Speedy Keen and Daniel Secunda deserve at the very least to have their ears cut off.” In Sounds, Jon Savage was less savage, but flung the word that stuck: “the songs… sound muddy.”

Confirming suspicions that the Heartbreakers were too messed up and sloppy to deal with, the response to the album hastened their demise. But the idea of restoring L.A.M.F. to its intended glory became a punk holy grail.

When Track went under in 1978, Heartbreakers manager Leee Black Childers broke into the offices to liberate the tapes. The masters were missing, but those 250-odd remixes remained. The first major reconstruction came in 1982, when Thunders reworked the tapes as L.A.M.F. Revisited, hailed as the

definitive version. In 1994, three years after Thunders’s death, there came another complete overhaul with L.A.M.F: The Lost ’77 Mixes, hailed as… well, you get the idea. Personality crisis, indeed.

Still preferred by many, Lost ’77 Mixes is included again here, but the centrepiece of this excellent 4-disc box is a carefully “de-muddied” new restoration of the original Track LP, created, in the absence of the masters, by running the 1977 vinyl through the latest mastering software. The results are, if not revelatory, at least deeply rewarding.

This restoration doesn’t have the sheer (some might argue shrill) in-your-face attack of Lost ’77 Mixes, but L.A.M.F. is revealed to have a thicker, warmer sound that proves much easier to spend time with. The bad news for fans is, you need to hear this one.

The worse news, though, is that L.A.M.F: Definitive Edition appears hot on the heels of *another* recent, highly significant, online restoration by the fans behind the whitetrashsoul blog, who discovered that various European pressings of the 1977 album were actually cut using different mixes again, and sound infinitely superior to the UK release. (I was sceptical, until I heard the aching “It’s Not Enough” unearthed from the French ’77 LP, and was gobsmacked by how its strumming bed of acoustic guitars chimed out like never before.)

The painstaking whitetrashsoul compilation is worth investigating, and comparing against the other alternative mixes amassed for Disc 4 here. The danger is, you’ll be sucked into the endless maze of trying to assemble your own “ultimate” L.A.M.F from various sources. As you wade through several subtly different versions of “Baby Talk” trying to find The One, you may find your bleeding ears going cross-eyed, and sympathise with what The Heartbreakers endured. Still one thing remains unaltered throughout: this really is one motherfucker of an album. That’s definitive.

EXTRAS: Alongside the restoration of the Track LP and The Lost ’77 Mixes, there’s a disc of early Heartbreakers demos, including four previously (officially) unreleased from the Richard Hell incarnation. The final disc offers more alternative mixes, including a “Born To Lose” that bizarrely buries Thunders’s guitar until it’s barely audible. There’s also a well-illustrated, 44-page booklet laying out the Heartbreakers’ saga, and four wee badges, to make you the envy of every punk in town.

Damien Love

Q&A

WALTER LURE

What’s your take on what happened with the sound?

WL: Everybody blamed the mix. Jerry in particular. I didn’t think the mix was bad, because when we played it back in the studio, it sounded fine. For me it was something that had happened when it got transferred from tape to vinyl. It lost the edge, got this muffled sound. To me, that pointed to the mastering. But, anyway, the mix was being blamed. We tried everything. We went to various studios, Abbey Road, I don’t know how many mastering studios, and tried to redo it. And every time: it sounded great in the studio, but as soon as went onto vinyl, it sounded like it was underwater. Jerry kept insisting it was the mix, so they gave him a few weeks in the studio alone to work on it. And his stuff came out sounding worse than the original. By this point, it was October ‘77, and the record company said, “Listen: this has got to be released.” Because they were going to miss the Christmas rush, they’d lose sales, and we’d lose our contract. They’d spent a lot of money on it by then, with all this time, eight, nine months, in different studios, bouncing around trying to fix it. So, Johnny, Billy and me said, “Well, okay.” But Jerry said if it was going to come out like that, he was going to quit the band right there. And he did. And the record came out, and that was what we were stuck with.

Leaving aside the sound problem, how was it recording?

WL: Well, we knew the songs inside out, because we had been playing them live for two years. So that was no problem. Toward the end, the sessions got more and more wild, because Johnny and Jerry would show up five or six hours late, because they were running around London trying to find their next pile of abusive substances. It got a bit hectic, people showing up to find they’d missed the session by 12 hours, but nothing really bad. But it was getting to the point that, if we *had* done another record, it would have been complete madness, because Johnny was getting increasingly out of control.

You were all sharing a house during that time, like some degenerate version of The Monkees…

WL: When we first got over there, we were crashing around at Sebastian Conran’s parent’s house, that December around the Anarchy Tour. Then, once we got the record contract, we moved into Pimlico, and that’s where we lived during most of the recording. A small basement flat. Me and Jerry shared a room, Billy had a room, and Johnny had a room. It got pretty nutty. Up all night. All sorts of weird people popping in and out. There’d be dealers coming over, we’d let them crash, then people would be going through their clothes in the middle of the night, trying to find their stash. Nancy Spungen came over, because she’d gotten a guitar of Jerry’s out of the pawnshop – that’s the only reason he let her in the house. And twenty minutes after she showed up, he threw her out. That’s when she went on to meet Sid, and, well, another story happened. It wasn’t like *complete* mayhem. A couple of us OD’d from time to time, and the others would throw us into the bathtub to wake us up. But other than that, it was pretty run of the mill.

INTERVIEW: DAMIEN LOVE

Kraftwerk – Album By Album

0
Former Kraftwerk percussionist Karl Bartos features in the new issue of Uncut (February 2013, Take 189), out now, discussing the upcoming Kraftwerk retrospective shows in London, and his own new solo album, Off The Record. As a companion piece, here’s Ralf Hütter taking us through the high points...

Former Kraftwerk percussionist Karl Bartos features in the new issue of Uncut (February 2013, Take 189), out now, discussing the upcoming Kraftwerk retrospective shows in London, and his own new solo album, Off The Record. As a companion piece, here’s Ralf Hütter taking us through the high points of Kraftwerk’s discography in a fascinating ‘album by album’ from Uncut’s October 2009 issue (Take 149).

___________________

He might have spent most of the past two decades cocooned in the Kubrickian perfectionism of his secret Kling Klang studio in Düsseldorf, but Kraftwerk’s Ralf Hütter is on unusually warm form when Uncut joins him for a rare face-to-face chat. Still surprisingly boyish at 62, the founding father of techno-pop, electro, techno, house and hip hop radiates sly mischief and ultra-dry German humour.

The acrimonious departure last year of Hütter’s fellow Kraftwerk founder, Florian Schneider, is still a sensitive subject. “We haven’t seen him for a long time,” Hütter shrugs. “I cannot speak for my former partner, friend and co-composer, but he always hated touring and concerts.”

In 2009, Kraftwerk are in the middle of their busiest creative phase for years, with a revamped studio setup and new album in gestation. This year alone they have played sold-out shows around the world, including a South American tour with Radiohead, and next month they release Der Katalog – their eight biggest albums in sumptuous, digitally remastered versions. The perfect time, then, for the elusive Hütter to relive four decades inside one of the greatest enigmas in music… Interview: Stephen Dalton

___________________

KRAFTWERK

(Vertigo, 1970)

Leaving behind their long-haired student jazz-rock band, Organisation, Hütter and Schneider established both the Kraftwerk name and their Kling Klang studio with this freeform instrumental four-track debut. Features a guest appearance by Klaus Dinger, later of Krautrock legends Neu!. But don’t use the K-word around Ralf…

“We were finding Kraftwerk, setting up the Kling Klang studio, finding musicians to work with, discovering composition, discovering the German language, human voice, synthetic voice. Me and Florian had our Kling Klang studio since 1970, and before that we had a free-form music group. We used to play at universities or parties or art galleries. And one day we said: OK, there must be a mothership, a laboratory, a studio HQ where we put things together.

“We were mostly like the art scene band, always on the same bill as Can. We had different drummers, and we engaged Klaus Dinger one time, but always changing. We had jazz drummers, rock drummers, and I had my little drum machine.

“This name, Krautrock – it’s coming from some idiots, I don’t know who, but it was never used in those times. The music was called Deutsch Rock, or electro rock, underground music, free rock. It really had no name, and it also had different colours in different cities. Like from Berlin it was more cosmic, with Cluster and Tangerine Dream. We were from Düsseldorf so more industrial, and Can in Cologne were more rock-orientated.

“This name was later introduced by people who maybe like this music, but it’s an insult, and it’s also nonsense because we don’t eat sauerkraut. And the music wasn’t made by vegetables. It’s like saying ‘fish and chips music’, or ‘spaghetti music’. It’s great that people can see the creativity, but maybe you can think of a more intelligent name?”

RALF & FLORIAN

(Mute/EMI, 1973)

Emphasising their status as a duo, Hütter and Schneider began to formulate a more polished, minimal, electronic sound on their transitional third album. This hard-to-find rarity is now due for re-release in the next wave of remasters.

“We were a duo all the time, we just had different studio musicians. But we were always looking for the perfect beat to be played by machines. We tried again and again, but it just never worked out, because they were never in synch. We were close to the visual arts scene in Düsseldorf, that is very important for Kraftwerk. It was audio-visual music because of the paintings and soundscapes. Words cannot really describe this, but you can actually see our music, I think…

“We listened to quite a lot of electronic stuff at that time. On the art scene, and on the radio. We were brought up within the kind of classical Beethoven school of music, but we were aware there was a contemporary music scene, and of course a pop and rock scene. But where was our music? Finding our voice, I think that was the use of the tape recorder. So that’s what happened, we tried to forget all the things we knew before. I think our contact to the tape recorder made us use synthetic voices, artificial personalities, all those robotic ideas.

“I’m working on the album tapes with my old friend, Emil Schult. This should maybe be our next interview, but it will be Kraftwerk 1 and 2, Ralf & Florian, and maybe one or two live ambient situations, whatever we find in the archive. It’s all in one part of our Kling Klang studio archives, but it needs some more work, redusting and remastering. There are lots of drawings and concepts, ideas that maybe a decade or two later came into reality. There have been bootlegs of these albums, but they are all printed from vinyl. Nobody has the tapes. Only we have the tapes.”

AUTOBAHN

(Mute/EMI, 1974)

Kraftwerk’s mainstream breakthrough, marking their emergence as revolutionary electro-pop minimalists. A condensed version of the mesmerising 22-minute title track became an international hit, leading to tours on both sides of the Atlantic. Some even saw its “fahren fahren fahren” refrain as a sly Beach Boys homage…

“Autobahn was about finding our artistic situation: where are we? What is the sound of the German Bundesrepublik? Because at this time bands were having English names, and not using the German language. Some people have said we introduced German rap, but it’s not really rap, its sprechgesang – spoken word singing. And from these rhythms and sounds we developed musical landscapes.

“It’s not about cars, it’s about the Autobahn. People forget that. It’s a road where we were travelling all the time: hundreds of thousands of kilometres from university to art galleries, from club to home. We didn’t even have money to stay in hotels so at night we’d be travelling home after playing somewhere. That’s very important, it’s not about cars, it’s about the Autobahn. It’s also a road movie, with a humorous twist.

“The white stripes on the road, I noticed them driving home every day from the studio, 20 kilometres on the Autobahn. And then the car sounds, the radio – it’s like a loop, a continuum, part of the endless music of Kraftwerk. In Autobahn we put car sounds, horn, basic melodies and tuning motors. Adjusting the suspension and tyre pressure, rolling on the asphalt, that gliding sound – pffft pffft – when the wheels go onto those painted stripes. It’s sound poetry, and also very dynamic.

“In the case of The Beach Boys, that song is about a T-Bird: ‘She had fun fun fun until daddy took her T-Bird away.’ But ours is about a Volkswagen or Mercedes. The quote is really more ethnic. People said: are you doing surfing on the Rhine? Yes, maybe, but we don’t have waves. It’s like an artificial joke. But no, it’s not a Beach Boys record, it’s a Kraftwerk record.

“All the tracks are like film loops, short films. ‘Morgenspaziergang’ [roughly translated as ‘morning stroll’] is what we wrote when we came out of the studio. We were always working at night and then in the morning, everything seems fresh and our ears are open again. Everything silent.

“We toured with Autobahn for the first time outside Germany. Just once in Paris University was our first time outside Germany, I think in ’73. But with Autobahn we also toured a very long time in America, then a shorter tour in England. But Germany had to be cancelled because there was no interest. That

was in ’75.

“The record was a very big success but nobody could imagine it live – is this a studio record? Or electronic? Nobody thought about going to see Kraftwerk behind the Autobahn record. Before that we toured in Germany all the time, from the late ’60s up to 1973. But then three years later nobody wanted to see us again. We came back in 1981, but still it was nothing like other countries.”

RADIO-ACTIVITY

(Mute/EMI, 1975)

Kraftwerk’s first all-electronic album, a nocturnal nightmare soundtrack with a dual meaning: the sound of crackling transistors and Cold War paranoia. Recorded during the Baader-Meinhof trials, which divided Germany and turned even young musicians into terrorist suspects.

“It’s a science fiction kind of album. Horror and beauty. The concept was infiltration by radio station – which is maybe more dangerous than radioactivity. We worked with tapes, editing pieces, glue. All electronics. And more singing and speaking, like speech symphonies.

“It was written in two languages, English and German. Autobahn was just one. It was not a statement, just these lyrics came to our mind – “Radioactivity, is in the air for you and me…” Just ideas coming together, and then anticipating the next album, which was all in two languages, like in films. There were always talks about Kraftwerk working with films, but they didn’t happen – apart from [German director Rainer Werner] Fassbinder, but he used finished pieces of our music in different interpretations in his films. Radio-Activity was a favourite of Fassbinder, he used it in Russian Roulette and in Berlin Alexanderplatz.

“When we were working on the artwork, we had these long rolled posters so our neighbours were reporting that we had weapons – that was the whole situation at that time. We travelled late at night and we’d be stopped for controls, Düsseldorf is a very controlled city, so they stop your cars and ask for your papers and permits. We were very night people, club scene people. They stopped us on the Autobahn, going to the studio. The police even came to our studio – because of the noise, maybe. But they didn’t come and knock on the door, they’d be coming in with pulled guns saying: ‘Where are the weapons?’”

TRANS-EUROPE EXPRESS

(Mute/EMI, 1977)

A romantic hymn to European integration, Trans-Europe Express earned its place in pop history as an unlikely catalyst for the nascent New York hip-hop scene, which liberally sampled its pounding metallic beats and piston-pumping rhythms. Hilarious sleeve artwork depicts the band as impeccably neat young businessmen.

“Trans-Europe Excess is basically a symphony of trains – train noises, Vienna, Paris. Travel is a big part of Kraftwerk. The pictures are not ironic, that’s our reality, that’s the life we are experiencing. That’s our cultural identity as Europeans, with the spirit of European culture. As you know, in Düsseldorf we live 20 minutes from the Netherlands, half an hour from Belgium, two hours from France. Berlin is farther away than Paris, even without the Wall. With all our friends, and at school, English language was very prominent. Living in Germany at that time, it was quite normal to talk in different languages. “Hall Of Mirrors” was written very fast. The mirror is a big theme with artists – like “Man In The Mirror” by Michael Jackson, and many others. At one time we also had mirrors as part of our Kling Klang studio to get visual feedback. There are some beautiful covers of that song. I like the version on the Trans Slovenian Express album, I think it is Anne Clarke singing to some Slovenian sounds. And also during the punk period, Siouxsie And The Banshees played that song.

“‘Showroom Dummies’, that is the transition from human to dummy to robots, from posing and static to animation and motorising. We were on our way to robotisation… is that a word? We are mainly talking about ourselves in that song, we felt photographed to death. That’s why we brought in the dummies, and later robots, because they have more patience with photographers. The lyrics in ‘Showroom Dummies’ are our day-to-day reality, going to clubs. In Germany the clubs are open very late, we don’t have that curfew like in England, the last drink at 9.30 or something. Ha! We are not playing that song at the moment but we played it a lot in ’81, and I think we will play it again because it’s valid.

“We received a Disco Award for that album in America – Best European Disco Band or something, it was very funny. I was in New York when the record came out doing some promo and then somebody from Capitol Records, the disco department or whatever, took us to some after-hours illegal clubs. I went with Florian and we were doing our little dance, and they played “Metal On Metal”. We knew the record because it was fairly new – but it went for five minutes, 10, 15, 20 minutes. What was happening? Then we found out they had two acetates, two pressings, and it was Bambaataa playing. Fantastic live DJing, that was in ’77, when they began experimenting with acetate like that. “Planet Rock” was five years later, and first of all they forgot to print my name. We had no credit so we called our publishers – and now they have our names on the record. Maybe that was because it was just a club record for a few thousand people, but then it exploded.”

THE MAN-MACHINE

(Mute/EMI, 1978)

Increasingly mechanised and minimal, this blueprint finds Kraftwerk at their most humorous, from the deadpan disco-funk of “The Robots” to the prophetic celebrity snapshot “The Model”, a future UK No 1 whose pointedly satirical subtext is sometimes overlooked. Also includes the much-covered romantic ballad, “Neon Lights”.

“At one point, playing an arts centre nearly 10 years before ‘The Robots’, I had this drum machine working, we were playing with feedback and strobe lights. We left the stage and people kept dancing to the machines. We didn’t have Kraftwerk, we didn’t have the robots, we didn’t have The Man-Machine album, nothing – but the concepts were already there.

“The lyrics to ‘The Model’ are identical in both languages, I think. I translated them. There is no difference. It’s about the context of an object, paying money: for beauty we will pay. I think the cynicism is obvious, don’t you? And then we’d get asked by everyone in clubs we went: is it me? Who is this? But it’s not based on anybody.

“The words are more like musical keys or clues, like in Autobahn or The Man-Machine, the sound says it all. Because we work so much with machines, the best music is playing itself – maybe through me, or through my friends and colleagues, but it’s coming from itself. That’s what we try to do. It’s not always possible, but we try our best. The ultimate speech composition is ‘Boing Boom Tschak’ [from ’86’s Electric Café] because the music speaks itself. It’s also endless because once you have that concept you can go on for five minutes, five hours or five days.”

COMPUTER WORLD

(Mute/EMI, 1981)

In a pre-digital age, Kraftwerk predict a computer-dominated future with pristine melodies and supple rhythms. But behind the surface shimmer lies a message about a new era of electronic surveillance…

“We didn’t even have computers. Even though the music was created by synthesisers and sequencers, it was analogue, pre-computer. We got our first home computers after the album was finished, the first Ataris. But no, it wasn’t a warning, it was reality. We were there, even though the album wasn’t made on computers, it was our reality. Society was being computerised, a lot of people didn’t notice at that time but we did. Computers were being used by states, the KGB, Interpol, Deutsche Bank.

“It was also talking about us: Kraftwerk, the Kling Klang studio, that was our computer world. We computerised our faces, and automated some of the lyrics. And “Pocket Calculator”, again it was really anticipating some kind of mobility. It really was made on a pocket calculator and toy instruments, like a Stylophone and a small children’s keyboard.

“We would like to have had laptops in 1981, but computers were huge IBMs, and they were not even transportable. The first Apple came in the late 1970s, but it was not available for us. When we first took our digital equipment into Eastern Bloc countries we had to list all of our equipment, because they were also part of weapons technology. We had to prove they are used for music and not weapons. Everything had to be listed, each piece of equipment, each brand name. Not from their side, from our side, in case you are bringing high-tech rocket material into the Eastern Bloc. But no, we were making art and music.”

TOUR DE FRANCE

(Mute/EMI, 2003)

Decades in gestation – building on their 1983 single of the same name – Hütter and Schneider’s final collaboration pays homage to their shared love of cycling. Originally released as Tour De France Soundtracks, it is now being reissued with its shorter intended title.

“It’s just called Tour De France. The Soundtracks was just a tracklisting at that time. It’s different films again, different soundtracks: ‘Vitamin’, ‘Aero Dynamik’, ‘Titanium’. But it’s also about personal experience, about regeneration, like a training plan.

“Sometimes we forget about things and they come back to us, they get a new meaning and a new dynamic, and then we find the concentration to finish a piece of work. Tour De France was all written before as scripts, notes, keywords, lyrics and concepts. In ’83, with the Tour, in a rush we released the single. Then it suddenly disappeared as we worked on digital technology, samplers, digitising our studio.

“And then, the 100 years’ birthday of the Tour was the signal to finish the album. All the mixes we did during the Tour, when we were invited by the directors to follow by helicopters and in the director’s car. Then we returned for the final mix. And when the Tour came to Paris, we delivered the tapes. Sometimes I get criticised for taking so long with the last album, but I can only answer that Autobahn took 28 years to make. Kraftwerk, and pre-Kraftwerk, was like seven years of working. People think you walk into a studio, turn some knobs and a new album is finished. That might be the case for one song. Maybe one record, maybe two – but not a lifetime’s work.”

Jack White’s ‘Blunderbuss’ is best-selling vinyl album of 2012

0
Jack White's Blunderbuss was the biggest-selling vinyl album of 2012. Released between Columbia Records and White's own Third Man Records, his debut solo album sold 33,000. The figure was enough for Blunderbuss to knock The Beatles's Abbey Road from the top spot, which had been the biggest-selling ...

Jack White‘s Blunderbuss was the biggest-selling vinyl album of 2012.

Released between Columbia Records and White’s own Third Man Records, his debut solo album sold 33,000. The figure was enough for Blunderbuss to knock The Beatles’s Abbey Road from the top spot, which had been the biggest-selling vinyl record for the past three years running.

The news is sure to delight White, a well-known vinyl enthusiast. He’s especially fond of odd formats and has released and developed a number of innovative analogue technologies over the years. In 2010, he unveiled a new ‘triple decker’ vinyl format he’d come up with for a Dead Weather release. It consisted of a 7″ single embedded on a 12″, while a limited number of solo single “Sixteen Saltines” were released on a special liquid-filled record for the US Record Store Day in April, 2012.

There was also the 3″ format he developed for White Stripes releases which required a special turntable – the battery powered Triple Inchophone – to play them, and only last March he gifted attendees of Third Man’s third birthday party with a special 3RPM record, which featured all of the label’s releases.

White wanted the record to be “easy to play but impossible to hear…” estimating it would take “333 days of 33 hours training per day for your finger, hand, and arm muscles to spin at a continuous speed of 3 rpm for X hours and X minutes.”

The sales of Blunderbuss are the highest of a new album (not re-release) since Soundscan began collecting vinyl sales data in 2008.