Film review

King Kong

Well, yes and no.

Jackson is undoubtedly a cinematic visionary who more than deserved his armload of Oscars for The Return of the King. The lessons he and his WETA digital effects team learned on Middle-Earth are used to astounding effect here. In the main, the visual effects piss all over anything that Lucasfilm have ever come up with. Three key sequences - Kong versus a gang of bloodthirsty tyrannosaurs, Kong at large in depression-era New York and Kong scaling the Empire State Building - are nothing short of breathtaking, and (in the case of Kong romping through a frozen Central Park) sometimes even beautiful.

Sadly, no matter how inventive Jackson's box of tricks is, he can't disguise the fact that this movie is an overlong, steroid-laced remake of a bank holiday classic that just about everyone's seen already. Nowhere near the triumph that the audacious Rings trilogy was - what could be? - this King Kong is nicely played, entertaining, creatively empty and ultimately rather pointless.

By Andrew Sumner

Rating: 3 / 10

DIRECTED BY Peter Jackson<br>STARRING Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody, Andy Serkis<br>OPENS DECEMBER 15, Cert 12A, 187 mins


Newsletter


Editor's Letter

The new Uncut revealed! Arctic Monkeys, Neil Young, Kate Bush and Warren Zevon in new issue


Next month, Arctic Monkeys play two shows at London’s Finsbury Park to more than 100,000 people, which makes it a reasonable moment to look back at the band’s journey from the Sheffield suburb of High Green to their current all-conquering place in a rock pantheon where they are...